The Updated X2 3800+ Overclocking Thread ...
- Thread starter A.N.Other
- Start date
. Will update the table in a minute.
Soldato
im currently running Prime on 260x10 2610 @ 1.425 and ram at 217 (166 devider) Will post back if it complete's 12 hours.
PRIME STABLE AT THIS CLOCK COULD YOU PLEASE UPDATE. THANKS
PRIME STABLE AT THIS CLOCK COULD YOU PLEASE UPDATE. THANKS
Last edited:
Soldato
well why dont we say you have to have a cpuz screenie and dual prime to be put on the list? of at least 12 hours.
I could add a column for stability, but I don't know who at the top was stable and who wasn't, as well slightly further down the list. Would people prefer to see only the stable clocks (which would probably be more useful) or to have the column for stability (which allows people's e-penises to grow)? 
I'm not overly bothered about screenshots tbh. You can link to them, but I don't want a load of massive screenies clogging up the thread. I think it just simpler if it's taken on trust for the most part, although people doing the suicide shots are welcome to give evidence if they want.
Thoughts and opinions?
I'm not overly bothered about screenshots tbh. You can link to them, but I don't want a load of massive screenies clogging up the thread. I think it just simpler if it's taken on trust for the most part, although people doing the suicide shots are welcome to give evidence if they want.
Thoughts and opinions?
Soldato
just add the extra column for stablility. and im gonna be a pain. cos im running prime on 2620 now i wonder how high it will go. i know it wouldnt do 2.7 but i might get up to 2.65
OK, I'll just highlight in red those that aren't stable. That's probably easiest. Although let it be known that I'm making guesses here, so if I put you as unstable incorrectly, poke me and I'll change it.
I've also knocked a few people out of the table because I hardly had any of their details - people have had quite long enough by now to fill me in
! If you've been dropped, you know what to do.
UPDATED TABLE to here, anyway.
I've also knocked a few people out of the table because I hardly had any of their details - people have had quite long enough by now to fill me in
! If you've been dropped, you know what to do.UPDATED TABLE to here, anyway.
I don't know whether mine was stable or not as I didn't have time to check.
I assumed it wouldn't be and primed for 8 hours at 2.85 and ran F@H for a day and a half before going away so I know it was stable at that (it since failed due to heat problems - the landlady got the plumbers in to fix the hot water and they left the central heating on
this, coupled with unusually warm weather for the North of Scotland = overheating CPU. I got a mate to take it back down to 2.50 until I get back to sort out heating/cooling).
I will have another fiddle when I get back as I will have more time.
I assumed it wouldn't be and primed for 8 hours at 2.85 and ran F@H for a day and a half before going away so I know it was stable at that (it since failed due to heat problems - the landlady got the plumbers in to fix the hot water and they left the central heating on
this, coupled with unusually warm weather for the North of Scotland = overheating CPU. I got a mate to take it back down to 2.50 until I get back to sort out heating/cooling).I will have another fiddle when I get back as I will have more time.
A.N.Other said:I could add a column for stability, but I don't know who at the top was stable and who wasn't, as well slightly further down the list. Would people prefer to see only the stable clocks (which would probably be more useful) or to have the column for stability (which allows people's e-penises to grow)?
I'm not overly bothered about screenshots tbh. You can link to them, but I don't want a load of massive screenies clogging up the thread. I think it just simpler if it's taken on trust for the most part, although people doing the suicide shots are welcome to give evidence if they want.
Thoughts and opinions?
I'd only ever suggest you included stability as a yes/no question and ask for no proof otherwise you find the overclocking police will turn up bleating about 72 hours of dual prime is their version of stability and blah blah.. staying on for a few hours is mine, they often have enough trouble doing that at stock so with a 60% overclock I'm more than happy
Soldato
Sorry to be a pain but ive put my memory on a higher divider and is now running at 238 2-2-2-2-7 3.2v
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=100624
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=100624
StevenG said:
not being funny mate but for the sake of slightly improved ram timings etc why not just work out your top clock and post it rather than posting everything you do? You've made over 10% of all the posts in this thread!
4Qman said:4Qman LDBHE 0605 FPMW
3350Mhz = CPUZ & Screen Shot only
3100Mhz = (24/7) Prime Stable
Id leave it at that mate and just add a section for the stepping. Mainly cos thats what everyone looks to compare against,
Nice! What stepping is that!? And cooling?
Soldato
matt100 said:
im done. lol. my chip wont do anything else.
failed at 2.65 and temps were a bit heigher. i'll stick with my 2.62 as it seems to be running quite well. 