Soldato
Yeah I think with the context of the cctv footage that shows the guy in the floor punching the officers only seconds before the head-kick changes things for me. He's clearly intent on using as much violence as he can against the police, and is potentially still an active danger (maybe in hindsight he wasn't, having been effectively incapacitated by the taser, but did the officer register that at the time? How sure can you be that someone will stay down after being tased?), and it's much more of a 'fight' than the officer just deciding to start kicking him out of nowhere.It now looks more like the firearms officer was in the middle of a vicious fight rather than just kicking the **** in the head for the fun of it.
The way the incident was framed initially by provocateurs made it sound like the officers just came and beat up these peaceful young men an indeterminate amount of time after some earlier altercation. But in reality they'd been viciously assaulting the police only seconds before.
If the two men had come out on top they could well have done a lot worse to the police...
It's really frustrating the way the media reported the story too. I think there should be some means of expediting release of ccvt & bodycam footage in cases like this where a false narrative has got significant traction. I understand it currently can't normally be released until after any criminal trials have concluded, but seems there should be some exceptions.
Last edited: