I'd hope he has given he is or was a serving officer of some sort (full time or special)
This is why people are losing respect for the police...
- Thread starter RossGReds
- Start date
- Status
I'd hope he has given he is or was a serving officer of some sort (full time or special)
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Jan 2012
- Posts
- 8,077
- Location
- The king of the north!
With the fuller context available whilst i don't speak for the law i don't personally feel like the officers use of force at this point wasnt unreasonable. A serious assault had taken place whilst the male was on the floor after being tasered there was always a possibility of further escalation. He safeguarded and protected his colleagues and members of public from becoming victim to any further attack that could have been carried out. Having watched the footage a few times all i can think is the males who assaulted the officers should be glad they aren't in the majority of other countries airports as they would have more than likely been shot almost immediately.
I believe the officer will get off with this with likely a warning. He doesn't deserve "the boot" hehehe
I believe the officer will get off with this with likely a warning. He doesn't deserve "the boot" hehehe
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 3 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 1,751
- Location
- wakefield
interesting points made here ,
youtu.be
Personal opinion made from watching various videos of this etc, stomp maybe ott but given the whole situation adrenaline came into play. needs a slap on the wrist at most.
LEAKED VIDEO: Police at Manchester Airport WHAT REALLY HAPPENED!
The video we NEEDED TO SEE - British armed police assaulted by two men who attack them all!Support the police, this is NOT acceptable in the UK!Life lessons ...
youtu.be
Personal opinion made from watching various videos of this etc, stomp maybe ott but given the whole situation adrenaline came into play. needs a slap on the wrist at most.
Would someone kindly summarise the video, what exactly is he exposing thats serious enough to lead to an arrest?
Associate
- Joined
- 17 Sep 2018
- Posts
- 1,476
He's breaching a court order that stated he libelled a Syrian schoolboy and he must cease and desist from doing so. The court case showed some of the evidence presented in that video to be fabricated.
Basically he's seen Trump getting away with breeching court orders and getting away with it and thought he'd try the same. The main difference being that the judge didn't want be seen to lock up an ex-President, where as our judges won't give 2 ***** about locking TR up.
interesting points made here ,
LEAKED VIDEO: Police at Manchester Airport WHAT REALLY HAPPENED!
The video we NEEDED TO SEE - British armed police assaulted by two men who attack them all!Support the police, this is NOT acceptable in the UK!Life lessons ...
Personal opinion made from watching various videos of this etc, stomp maybe ott but given the whole situation adrenaline came into play. needs a slap on the wrist at most.
Really good video and puts this whole thing into a different context. I was appalled when I first saw the video on BBC and now I’ve changed my mind completely. Hopefully the full investigation clears the officer (who took an absolute battering) and the two thugs are arrested and sent down.
If you don’t want to get tazed or kicked by a police officer, an armed one at that, bloody well behave.
Well that's just it why behave? When you can get the backing of main stream media and play the minority victim card, especially when we have a weak-toast government who play the same games for power.
I suspect he wants to be nelson mandela, or whomever is paying him to do this for all these years is offering an incentive for jail time.
Associate
- Joined
- 3 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 1,751
- Location
- wakefield
when he mentions the SAS and what theyd do in that situation and didnt go on to explain was interesting. but in reality any other place such as the states the lads would be shot. they need immediately detaining until it all blows over.
I don't know the exact reason TR as been arrested this time, apparently under the Terrorism Act 2000?
IF this is for showing a video then it seems to be an over the top use of anti Terrorist laws. Something groups like Liberty and Big Brother Watch warned us about.
But if there is more to the arrest then please enlighten me.
IF this is for showing a video then it seems to be an over the top use of anti Terrorist laws. Something groups like Liberty and Big Brother Watch warned us about.
But if there is more to the arrest then please enlighten me.
Associate
- Joined
- 17 Sep 2018
- Posts
- 1,476
See Post 4188. Breached a court order
Yes.
There’s quite a few similarities between the Muslim lads at the airport and the nasty piece of work Syrian boy, in that the media’s bias and lies were typical.
Let’s not forgot how this darling innocent child threatened to rape 9 year old girls and stab other people and continually bullied smaller kids.
Maybe listen to the head teacher whose life was turned upside down, his career gone, can't get a job and has also been silenced by the council in that if he didn’t sign an NDA he’d lose his pension.
Maybe listen to the parents who explain what sort of child he was and what his behaviour was like.
There’s plenty plenty more than that.
But hey, let’s gloss over all of that, eh?
To any one interested watch from 17mins on with the head teacher.
Genuinely worried for this country - we are on a rapid decline.
That is my worry - this country is rapidly declining and there is no respect for our laws from some. Do we really want to go down the route of the US? Arm all our police, then the public will want rights to arm themselves - slippery slope.
Also, why do we always call for sacking people as a first reposnse? Hundreds of thousands of pounds to train our police, years of experience, but one error or perceived error and the backlash is 'sack 'em!" We can't sack everyone, Cops are on their arses as it atm.
TLDR: Be careful what you wish for.
That is my worry - this country is rapidly declining and there is no respect for our laws from some. Do we really want to go down the route of the US? Arm all our police, then the public will want rights to arm themselves - slippery slope.
Also, why do we always call for sacking people as a first reposnse? Hundreds of thousands of pounds to train our police, years of experience, but one error or perceived error and the backlash is 'sack 'em!" We can't sack everyone, Cops are on their arses as it atm.
TLDR: Be careful what you wish for.
Associate
- Joined
- 17 Sep 2018
- Posts
- 1,476
There's much more in common with the Muslim lads at the airport and Tommy Robinson actually, given TR was convicted of assaulting a police officer. The officer was kicked in the head after he tried to stop TR assaulting his girlfriend. But don't let that get in your way of hero worship
You should know TR lost his libel case because he could not prove most of his accusations. The girl who claimed to be hit by hockey stick was proven to be lying for instance.
Last edited:
It's being slightly misrepresented as not all of the arrests were from that group. Some were 'counter protesters'.
Perhaps these are "normal people" for some on here? The silenced majority.
Well the answer to this is easy.
Years of scandals involving officers and a general skepticism that their priorities are wrong has sadly (though unsurprisingly) broken trust so there's not a lot of space for the authorities to operate now when it comes to situations like this.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 24 Jun 2021
- Posts
- 4,115
- Location
- Oxon
There was a stream going round the march interviewing people, they were just normal people. Football yobs may have been there, but the bulk of the crowd wasn't them, it was normal people sick of immigrants taking resources that we don't have.
And in the most blatant and public way possible.
Given he's got previous for breaching court orders, and the manner in which he did it this time about the only way he's likely to avoid jail time (again) is because there aren't enough prison cells to lock him away for something approaching the maximum that you can get for the offence.
He's a repeat offender for multiple crime, almost the classic sort of pattern of offending that many of his defenders would be saying should result in prison for life as he's never learned not to break the law, or court orders.
No, we'd go down the route of other European countries or Australia, but most likely adopt a New Zealand style approach in the first instance where all officers are trained to use firearms but have them secured in the vehicle without routinely carrying them.
Routine arming is decades away anyway, there isn't a single British force (specialist ones aside) that equips every officer with a Taser so they're not about to start handing out pistols. Plus the country simply can't afford it as the training, equipment and recruitment would cost millions. No force has that in their budget and by the sounds of it the Home Office doesn't either.
- Status