Very unlikely to be authorised to doing anything but to follow within speed limits in a van, but it’s the driver that is certified for pursuits, hard stops and not the vehicle.I'm pretty sure a police van like that would never be authorised to perform a chase, I stand to be corrected though.
so they were following surreptitiously on the basis the youths weren't looking over their shoulders.The police van, which was captured on CCTV, was not on the same street as the collision occurred.
If they crashed trying to evade the police then it's their own fault, whether they were being chased or being followed, I don't really care tbh, It's not difficult to keep up with ebikes.
Are the police meant to do nothing if teenagers break the law? What's the message here? Don't follow them in case they hurt themselves? ffs
The message here is that none of that even matters (facts are irrelevant, truth is relative) and all it takes is a few incendiary messages going viral in a community for it to implode in chaos.If they crashed trying to evade the police then it's their own fault, whether they were being chased or being followed, I don't really care tbh, It's not difficult to keep up with ebikes.
Are the police meant to do nothing if teenagers break the law? What's the message here? Don't follow them in case they hurt themselves? ffs
I was looking in to the reports of this situation closer.
It seems the police are denying they were there until someone reported the crash and then they turned up to investigate. Based off the current information it looks like, for whatever reason the police are lying. In a follow-up statement they are still saying that the first they knew of the crash was when they turned up after it had happened.
They can quite clearly be seen on the camera following/chasing (either) the scooter.
Still even though that seems to be the situation so far it's no excuse to be trashing a street where people live.
That's not what they said. Their statements and the CCTV don't contradict each other.With those 2 Welsh lads who died, Police "There was no chase", CCTV seems to show a chase.
Police in being liars shocker.
And in the updated statement:Police responded to this collision which had already occurred when officers arrived, and they remained on scene to manage a large-scale disorder until the early hours of this morning.
It's perfectly reasonable that the police van spotted teenagers on illegal motor vehicles and followed them long enough to give the control room descriptions and direction of travel etc and then either stopped or the bikes lost police by going down footpaths. There were also 4 minutes between the CCTV and the collision, that's plenty of time for the bikes to lose the police and get into an RTC.We have received CCTV footage which shows a police vehicle following a bike just prior to 6pm. This footage is being recovered as part of the investigation which will assist us in piecing together the circumstances leading up to the collision. The families are being kept up to date.
We can confirm that following investigations carried out so far, that when then collision occurred, there were no police vehicles on Snowden Road. A police vehicle in Grand Avenue responded to the report of a collision, attended the area and the officers performed CPR.
The investigation has involved studying CCTV and tracking data from the police vehicle.
At this stage, we do not believe that any other vehicle was involved in the collision.
It's both the driver and the vehicle. A fully trained advanced driver with tactical phase pursuit training can't box a vehicle in a van unless it's really exceptional circumstances. In my force, the can't even use tactics in most response vehicles, only advanced-level vehicles.Very unlikely to be authorised to doing anything but to follow within speed limits in a van, but it’s the driver that is certified for pursuits, hard stops and not the vehicle.
Welsh lives matter
The people on the ground said the police were chasing/following them and caused the crash.That's not what they said. Their statements and the CCTV don't contradict each other.
Initially:
And in the updated statement:
It's perfectly reasonable that the police van spotted teenagers on illegal motor vehicles and followed them long enough to give the control room descriptions and direction of travel etc and then either stopped or the bikes lost police by going down footpaths. There were also 4 minutes between the CCTV and the collision, that's plenty of time for the bikes to lose the police and get into an RTC.
It's both the driver and the vehicle. A fully trained advanced driver with tactical phase pursuit training can't box a vehicle in a van unless it's really exceptional circumstances. In my force, the can't even use tactics in most response vehicles, only advanced-level vehicles.
Because rioting doesn't rely on knowing the truth? I bet all sorts of rumours and misinformation were floating about that evening. The facts don't matter when you've got people riled up and wanting to cause mayhem.If the police version is right that no police were on the scene at the time of the crash then why did people riot?
You clearly have never been to Merthyr Tydfil.
The people on the ground said the police were chasing/following them and caused the crash.
If the police version is right that no police were on the scene at the time of the crash then why did people riot?
I always remember a comment I read about mobs and it was something along the lines of "the intelligence of the mob is somewhere around the that of the dumbest member of it, divided by the number in the mob" mainly in regards to Lynch mobs etc.The people on the ground said the police were chasing/following them and caused the crash.
If the police version is right that no police were on the scene at the time of the crash then why did people riot?
If the police version is right that no police were on the scene at the time of the crash then why did people riot?
You clearly have never been to Merthy Tydfil.