This is why people are losing respect for the police...

Status
Not open for further replies.
**** that mizzy idiot c word.

I hope he messes with the wrong person and ends up paralyzed or better.
But he wont because he is a c word.
product of a failed upbringing or what.
He probably won't buy you bet your ass a copy cat 'prankster' will mess with the wrong person soon enough.
 
Industry experts examining CCTV footage taken minutes before the crash say the bike the boys were riding looks similar to a Sur-Ron electric motorcycle moped, costing £4,495. Weighing just 51kg, they have a top speed of 30mph, although they can be modified for off-road use. The model and whether the rider had the correct licence for on-road riding forms part of a South Wales Police investigation.
...
The Met’s Operation Venice was set up specifically to tackle “motorcycle- enabled crime”, targeting robbery hotspots in central, south and west London, with 180 victims attacked each week. The team is authorised to use “tactical contact” to bump suspects off mopeds or e-bikes, in a game of cat and mouse across the capital.
...
Hi-Fi Confidential Bike UK pleaded guilty at Highbury magistrates court in London and was fined £3,864 for fitting electric pedal bikes with motors powered to 750 watts, three times over the legal limit, capable of speeds of 32 mph. It was only the second case of its kind in the UK and the first to prove the company was advertising the powerful e-bikes for use on the road, despite them being legal for off-road use only.

was (operation) Venice an arbitrary name is there a lot of pedestrian attacks in Venice(beach?) , ironic name .. or we have arrved at 'V'
 
To put it mildly I think that Mizzy deserves a good slap. The problem in this country is lack of funding for not only the police but all the other public services that float in that area. It isnt the fear of hurting someones feelings.

What I didnt agree with is the leftie ideology BS thing.

You don't need much funding to allow the police to give the young scroats causing chaos for everyone a good kick in.
 
Not really you get 10k and sorry bud. It really is that simple.
There appear to be cases of forces paying out six figure sums for wrongful arrests (I'm sure the average pleb isn't getting this tbh), I don't think millions for disablement or killing someone is that insane.

Not saying they shouldn't be more forceful, but there are risks to contemplate here.
 
Last edited:
:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek::eek:


Pathetic response from the cops here, especially the male one just practically standing around watching it happen.

She should have been taken to the ground and restrained regardless of her being a woman (a d that's being kind)

Actually, I would have to get @hurfdurf to do it for me given I'm just projecting and wouldn't actually do a thing... That right @hurfdurf ? :rolleyes: :cry:
 
I’ve been called liberal leftie far more than most people on here, and I’ve also been warned by the mods for offering to meet people to settle discussions about use of force or choking and offered to fight/demonstrate I’m right and they are wrong on said specific topic.

To be fair, that is pretty pathetic, isn't it? Offering to beat someone up because you believe that will prove you're right?1

This is speaking as someone who agrees with some of your liberal views.
 
To be fair, that is pretty pathetic, isn't it? Offering to beat someone up because you believe that will prove you're right?1

This is speaking as someone who agrees with some of your liberal views.

Context is king. If we were arguing about which food tasted better, of course violent combat wouldn’t prove anything either way and would be pathetic.

If someone is claiming they would and could beat someone up and that they are brave and the other person is not, and I offer them the chance to do it in a polite and safe fashion, is that pathetic?

The main crux was the George Floyd thread, where many of the usual posters who were certain the cop didn’t do anything wrong and you couldn’t restrict someone’s breathing going knee on neck. I offered to show them, in a controlled environment, that even with their hands uncuffed, if I got them in knee on belly, they would tap out, and if I ignored the tap then took their back and went knee on neck, I could stop them breathing.

Unsurprisingly despite giving it the big man and claiming to know all about physical combat, medical issues and tough guys themselves, none actually took me up on the offer to have a go, and despite the context, my further offers post that thread were deemed uncouth by the mods, which is frankly fair.

Turns out, the cop was demonstrably killing Floyd in court by every credible medical expert and use of force practitioner.

It all worked out in the end, I’m now paid to post here off the back of it and the trans thread.
 
Pathetic response from the cops here, especially the male one just practically standing around watching it happen.

She should have been taken to the ground and restrained regardless of her being a woman (a d that's being kind)

Actually, I would have to get @hurfdurf to do it for me given I'm just projecting and wouldn't actually do a thing... That right @hurfdurf ? :rolleyes: :cry:

Be cool to watch you in the same situation imo!

Cops in the uk appear to get zero to incompetent training on how to deal with someone resisting never mind actively fighting them. When most new officers come to the gym they are actually worse than people with zero experience in ways because they try doing the stuff they are taught on the job and it’s useless, rather than being a blank slate.
 
The strength of filling job quotas finally paying off.

Replacing 20k experienced well paid officers with Uni students with zero police experience, who can’t afford to buy a house on the salary they are on, is going to get you the above results.

The UK is a failed state, do not expect the police to be able to protect you or your belongings anymore. Protect yourself at all times using reasonable force within the law. Help is not coming.
 
Last edited:
To be fair, that is pretty pathetic, isn't it? Offering to beat someone up because you believe that will prove you're right?1

This is speaking as someone who agrees with some of your liberal views.
If you read enough posts from Hurfdurf, then it becomes clear he has mental developmental issues with results in lack of confidence and deep social anxiety which he tries to make up with, or masks with exhibition and egotism. I've seen many real life examples and they all turn out the same. The worst part they are completely unaware of what they seem like to the rest of us.
 
If you read enough posts from Hurfdurf, then it becomes clear he has mental developmental issues with results in lack of confidence and deep social anxiety which he tries to make up with, or masks with exhibition and egotism. I've seen many real life examples and they all turn out the same. The worst part they are completely unaware of what they seem like to the rest of us.

Ah yes, all a mask, I’m really just like you, I just pretend not to be day to day to get by, fake it until you make it! You being able to see through it is incredible. Unfortunately in faking it I seemed to have stumbled into a very different existence to you, but no, truly, take it all away, you and I are the exact same.
 
Context is king. If we were arguing about which food tasted better, of course violent combat wouldn’t prove anything either way and would be pathetic.

If someone is claiming they would and could beat someone up and that they are brave and the other person is not, and I offer them the chance to do it in a polite and safe fashion, is that pathetic?


Yeah. It's still pretty pathetic. Them being a dipstick doesn't give you dipstick immunity if you are, in fact, being a dipstick.

If you're in doubt about whether you're about to be a dipstick, ask yourself this question - Am I offering to fight someone because I disagree with them on the internet?
 
Yeah. It's still pretty pathetic. Them being a dipstick doesn't give you dipstick immunity if you are, in fact, being a dipstick.

If you're in doubt about whether you're about to be a dipstick, ask yourself this question - Am I offering to fight someone because I disagree with them on the internet?

Am I offering to prove a point using real life examples related to the matter Vs just randomly offering to fight people?

If people were arguing which car was faster, would they be dipsticks by meeting up to race them to find out?
 
Still a yes to be honest. :cry:

I mean, you could hardly have picked a better analogy for proving it's horribly petty than a pair of wannabe race drivers arguing about whose car is faster.

Are you going to suggest a penis measuring next?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom