Why? I know he's a bit of pig at times but he's a great manager..
He doesnt play attacking football now does he, never has done really. Men behind the ball and on the counter attack. How toothless did Chelsea look without Hazard for example.
Why? I know he's a bit of pig at times but he's a great manager..
He doesnt play attacking football now does he, never has done really. Men behind the ball and on the counter attack. How toothless did Chelsea look without Hazard for example.
Suarez didn't wangle away did he? lol
You don't have to be an expert to understand contracts mean jack...
Yes Trusty, contracts in the modern game tie players to their clubs, you believe that and I'll leave you in your own little world
You're going to have a shock when you realise there isn't a Santa Clause.
I hope not
Hazard and Firmino feeding Diego Costa... That would be quite a nice setup for breaking through a parked bus.
I have no idea what we're talking about really. Sometimes players stay, sometimes players go. There are thousands of external factors in play..
Original point remains though, Chelsea won't be letting him leave. They want to do the quadruple next season i'd of thought, you can't do that selling your best players.
That's the point, you can't categorically know that he won't leave. Hence my original question which you jumped on to tell me he wouldn't be going anywhere as he's contracted.
Yea..but i'm just saying Chelsea won't let him leave as he's a good player and exactly the type of direct player that Chelsea want in their philosophy..
He's like Bale and Ronaldo in they way that he plays..
I wouldn't say he's that much like Bale and Ronaldo either.
I understand what you're saying but you then went on to argue that he is going nowhere as he is contracted, you then go on to name 2 players who left their clubs whilst contracted!!!
It's quite simple Trusty, whether you think he will leave or not is irrelevant, what is relevant is that players move clubs whilst in contract and the fact that he is their best player is irrelevant in that circumstance, for instance, Mata was Chelsea's player of the year 2 years running and then frozen out.
Ronaldo and Bale were their teams best players, they were still sold.
Comprende?
Lol..mate..i'm not arguing anything really. Yea..Chelsea don't need to sell him though, you're forgetting about that one eh. Ball is firmly positioned in Chelsea's court..
Unless of course, there is this master plan to replace him with several attacking players. I have'nt seen anything of the sorts though that would suggest Chelsea are willing to let him go..
Put the handbags away chaps, no one wants to read through your spat
Cardiff City received just over £62m in TV money this year, the lowest in the League. Last season Utd, who received the highest amount of TV money, received just under £61m.
Serious money is going to be spent this summer.
I thought that all came onto play last season? I remember reading something bout clubs having an extra 20 million to play with due to the new TV deals?
The new TV deal kicked in at the start of this season. The PL have just announced the exact figures each club received this season. I believe the money is paid in several instalments throughout the season however there's no doubt that clubs would have factored the extra money into their spending last summer.
Last seasons pay outs were anything between £40m and £61m. This season it's £62m to £97m.