Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Apr 2010
- Posts
- 5,289
- Location
- Ipswich
TrueDon't spell it out, given their posting history they can't possibly be ignorant of the reasoning.
TrueDon't spell it out, given their posting history they can't possibly be ignorant of the reasoning.
Different industries have different priorities and can all be managed in a useful way.I work with out of ours emergency contractors every night, they are not fast they will often be hours away from any site, they will always arrive and get the work done but its not a simple case of you make the call and they are there within the hour unless they are close by. They will often be attending all throughout the night to various places across their designated regions.
This wont work in a situation where you need immediate response on site with fire arms. Its too slow to deal with the sort of issues people have to deal with on farms and large conservation areas. Add in the additional requirement to be carrying firearms in a vehicle which will need to be designed to store them safely and it just wont work.
crossbows of >150lbs draw weight have a very slow rate-of-fire.
Different industries have different priorities and can all be managed in a useful way.
I never had you down as being this illogical and obtuseDifferent industries have different priorities and can all be managed in a useful way.
Different industries have different priorities and can all be managed in a useful way.
You're doing a lot of this, posting without actually saying anything. It would be more helpful if you provided explanations.:facepalm: does the nature of rural areas also need spelling out to you?
You do know how much some fire arms are worth?
Why should he, it's not like you will take any notice or change your point of view.You're doing a lot of this, posting without actually saying anything. It would be more helpful if you provided explanations.
I knew a guy called Leon. He was totes pro.I can't help but think the arguments are going off track here. I don't think the fine details matter, they can be up for negotiation. I don't think anyone is calling for an absolute ban on all guns, rather that regulations should be significantly tighter and guns should only be in the hands of professionals. If farmers need training to be that, then so be it. Otherwise they hire a professional. They have a choice.
Thanks for at least providing your reasoning.I work with OOH(Out of ours) contractors from all industries, Infrastructure engineers (all the sub divisions that may include electricians and the like).
I also work with pest controllers/hunters etc and people who attend sights to deal with animals.
It is not that simple and your idea wont work based on the needs of said industries, it will be TOO SLOW.
Then perhaps don't be so quick to dismiss my comments.I never had you down as being this illogical and obtuse
as well as having localised services in most farming areas etc.
Thanks for at least providing your reasoning.
I think the volume of farmers in comparison would help facilitate a workable solution, as well as having localised services in most farming areas etc.
Yes but you're sensible and conscientious unfortunately not everyone is the same.Ammunition already has to be stored separately from the firearm. It can be in the same cabinet, but it has to be in a separate compartment with a different lock.
I keep mine totally apart, in separate cabinets.
Surely by now you'll realise that perhaps they do need spelling out? As that way, solutions can be thought of etc. rather than "nope, not gonna happen".Farming areas usually are quite remote and spread out over a large area, sometimes without great transport infrastructure (despite the use of whacking great lorries and trucks) it shouldn't need spelling out how this makes a problem for your idea and there are plenty of genuine reasons why the likes of farmers need ready and quick access to firearms which also shouldn't need spelling out.
Exactly, I stated earlier farmers could retain them if they were part of these professional services.As I already said I see no reason why farmers couldn't be given a choice. They either train to be a professional or they hire a professional. I think most would train. But that would be more heavily regulated than it is now.
As I already said I see no reason why farmers couldn't be given a choice. They either train to be a professional or they hire a professional. I think most would train. But that would be more heavily regulated than it is now.
Exactly, I stated earlier farmers could retain them if they were part of these professional services.