A lack of evidence doesn't mean you can decide who did it.Supposing it was the US or UK who did it via special forces with submarines, what evidence would there be? Does a lack of evidence mean it didn't happen?
A lack of evidence doesn't mean you can decide who did it.Supposing it was the US or UK who did it via special forces with submarines, what evidence would there be? Does a lack of evidence mean it didn't happen?
I don't think Trump was a big fan of NATO, but this is merely speculation and hearsay, he's mentioned nothing about wanting to pull out of NATO. If he felt the US should pull out of NATO as part of 'America First' he would just say that, because he says everything else he thinks and believes. There's almost nothing Trump thinks that he doesn't articulate.
A lack of evidence doesn't mean you can decide who did it.
I hope you gave your clown nose a beautiful toot after posting this.
Trump first mentioned leaving NATO on the 2016 election trail.
The BBC trying to make out like Russia blew up their own pipeline and it wasn't the UK/US lolol
Just FYI there's no one who seriously thinks Russia blew up their own pipeline. There's just no benefit to them in doing that. The US has wanted Nordstream ending since it's conception.
![]()
Opinion – The US and Nord Stream 2 Geopolitics
Nord Stream 2 has further exposed the divisions within EU and allowed the US to have a balancing impact on the varying interests of different European countries.www.e-ir.info
There's a ton of articles prior to the invasion discussing American views on Nordstream.
Interesting interview with Professor Phillips O’Brien, head of the School of International Relations at the University of St Andrews on Ukraine and Russia.
![]()
47. The Big Interview: Phillips O'Brien on Intelligence Leaks, Ukrainian Resolve, and Managing Expectations.
Podcast Episode · Battleground · 03/05/2023 · 40mpodcasts.apple.com
You have to be an idiot to not see what's before your very eyes.I personally don't believe Putin had power over Trump, but there's no denying that Trump's grip on international affairs was laughably poor, and he was planning to withdraw from NATO.
I don't think this had anything to do with Putin or Russia. I don't think Trump was influenced by them at all. I think he was just talking out of his arse as usual, because he simply does not understand geopolitics, and the realpolitik governing an alliance like NATO is beyond his comprehension.
Trump wanted to pull out of NATO because he considered it a waste of taxpayers' money and its aims ran contrary to his 'America first, let's stop being the world's policeman' philosophy, which is ironically a position I have some sympathy for.
Why do you keep making passive aggressive remarks? I don't think I'm doing the same to you. If you have some sort of an issue with me let's take it to PM
Please don't, otherwise you'll find yourself suspended.
There's some posters in this thread giving out personal insults.
I don't have the powers to fix that, but report the posts and the admins / mods can deal with it.
Lets talk a few facts, where does trump get all his money? Russia that's where, his moron son boasted about them getting all the money they need from Russia. You don't think that comes with strings attached?
From the same people trying to convince you the U.S blew up nordstream
You're saying they did with no evidence other than the desire to stop it, that's not proof.![]()
President Biden on Nord Stream 2 Pipeline if Russia Invades Ukraine: "We will bring an end to it."
During a joint news conference with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, President Biden is asked about the Nord Stream 2 pipeline."If Russia invades, that means t...youtu.be
Ok man, I highlighted the specific point in the video, but if Joe Biden telling you what the US would do if Russia invaded, which they did, isn't enough then you're beyond convincing.
You're saying they did with no evidence other than the desire to stop it, that's not proof.
Thus there is plenty of space for a Russian false flag to attribute blame to the US as a means to drive a wedge between Berlin and Washington.
You're saying they did with no evidence other than the desire to stop it, that's not proof.
Thus there is plenty of space for a Russian false flag to attribute blame to the US as a means to drive a wedge between Berlin and Washington.
Yes, it would be rather difficult for me, or anyone, to get evidence given it would likely be conducted by special forces operating from a submarine. My bad though.