**Unofficial Tyre Thread**

Soldato
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
10,279
Location
Stoke
On an M3 I'd probably agree - I'm not so sure it makes a huge amount of difference on my 5 series diesel noticeably :p

In addition, Michelin have since released PS5 (although I know the PS5 doesn't replace the 4S but rather the 4 at this stage) and other top end tyres have been released like Conti SportContact7 which could then outrival the older PS4S * Mark version. Plus there's additional cost for * Mark over standard. My 245/40/19 would be an additional £15 a corner!
 
Man of Honour
Joined
20 Sep 2006
Posts
34,509
On an M3 I'd probably agree - I'm not so sure it makes a huge amount of difference on my 5 series diesel noticeably :p

In addition, Michelin have since released PS5 (although I know the PS5 doesn't replace the 4S but rather the 4 at this stage) and other top end tyres have been released like Conti SportContact7 which could then outrival the older PS4S * Mark version. Plus there's additional cost for * Mark over standard. My 245/40/19 would be an additional £15 a corner!
My point is that the tyres are different, and therefore it's not marketing guff.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
91,947
I bought a set of Goodyear Vector 4 season G3 a couple of years ago based on this channels test. Worst tyres I have ever had in every way. Never bother with tyre reviews after that.

Problem with these kind of reviews is they rely heavily on synthetic benchmarks and a minor bit of subjective testing limited to the setup the reviewer(s) are using.

In the real world things can be quite different i.e. a tyre with the shortest braking distance might be a mile away from the control and composure under heavy braking of the 2nd or 3rd closest tyre in many real world situations allowing you to stop much more safely, etc.
 
Soldato
Joined
22 May 2003
Posts
10,856
Location
Wigan
They are pushing the advertising on the Goodyears this year, seen it a few times on a yellow car in the snow.

Said before my CC+ experience is excellent and lasted a long time. Have no hesitation about buying CC2 but not available in my size.
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Jan 2015
Posts
5,298
Location
Consett
Anyone have any experience of all season tyres, Michelin Crossclimate 2 Vs continental contacts?

I've had crossclimates on for 2 years and was considering trying the continentals out.
 
Underboss
Joined
20 Oct 2002
Posts
32,761
Location
Oxfordshire / Bucks
Anyone have any experience of all season tyres, Michelin Crossclimate 2 Vs continental contacts?

I've had crossclimates on for 2 years and was considering trying the continentals out.


TyreTotalDry BrakingDry HandlingWet BrakingWet HandlingStraight AquaCurved AquaplaningSnow BrakingSnow TractionSnow HandlingNoisePriceRolling Resistance
Michelin CrossClimate 292.2%38.6M79.3s32.20M99s78.80Km/H6.5m/sec231.10M5.50s110s69.6dB93.997.9kg / t
Hankook Kinergy 4S291.5%39.20M79.3s31.60M97.1s80.50Km/H7.5m/sec232.30M6.00s114.3s69.4dB87.898.5kg / t
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 390.8%41.60M78.7s31.90M97.5s79.30Km/H7.3m/sec231.50M7.10s114.7s69.5dB958.2kg / t
Continental AllSeasonContact89.5%41.60M78.8s33.20M98.1s78.30Km/H6.7m/sec232.40M6.80s115.5s69.7dB918.1kg / t
 
Soldato
Joined
22 May 2003
Posts
10,856
Location
Wigan


TyreTotalDry BrakingDry HandlingWet BrakingWet HandlingStraight AquaCurved AquaplaningSnow BrakingSnow TractionSnow HandlingNoisePriceRolling Resistance
Michelin CrossClimate 292.2%38.6M79.3s32.20M99s78.80Km/H6.5m/sec231.10M5.50s110s69.6dB93.997.9kg / t
Hankook Kinergy 4S291.5%39.20M79.3s31.60M97.1s80.50Km/H7.5m/sec232.30M6.00s114.3s69.4dB87.898.5kg / t
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 390.8%41.60M78.7s31.90M97.5s79.30Km/H7.3m/sec231.50M7.10s114.7s69.5dB958.2kg / t
Continental AllSeasonContact89.5%41.60M78.8s33.20M98.1s78.30Km/H6.7m/sec232.40M6.80s115.5s69.7dB918.1kg / t
It’s a reasonably good review. You can’t tell the long term wear and abilities of the tyres from it. The wet handling/aqua of the CC2 is slightly worse than the other tyres, but then it starts off with less tread than any of its competitors.

Without knowing how well the others wear, and how the tyre performs when worn it’s difficult to judge long term which is the best tyre. Michelin claim the performance of the tyre to be excellent all the way through its lifespan right down to the legal limit.

I’d like to see the CC+ included in that test to demonstrate where the CC2 is improved and by how much.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
91,947
You can’t tell the long term wear and abilities of the tyres from it.

On that note personally I've liked the handling/performance of Continental tyres but not found they last as long as the competition (I've seen quite a few people say the Michelin CCs have much better feel in the dry than the similar style Contis and Goodyear).

Depending on vehicle (more for SUVs and 4x4s) and use I'd probably suggest the Conti Cross Contact or Cross Contact ATR over the All Season Contact as they probably have a better balance of summer performance while still being capable in adverse conditions in the rare times we get it bad enough in the UK to warrant something other than a summer tyre.
 
Associate
Joined
25 Mar 2021
Posts
275
Location
Mid lands
It depends on an area in UK. High lands seem to go full winter. Even midlands have some snow once in a while.
I had Nexen Nblue all weather and was happy. They are not even on a test with TR guy! I think he is doing reviews for the advertising of his website. As to have more exposure to his business. The person does not need to get paid directly from certain companies. It could be indirect such as invites to tests with accomodation provided etc.
 
Associate
Joined
19 Aug 2005
Posts
1,408
Location
Beds, UK
i guess that make sense when the car is new, but when its, say 5 years old, is OE still "better than aftermarket"?

If they ever build my BMW 1 series, it comes with some bridgestones S005s, which everyone says are rubbish. the only Star marked options are the "Pirelli P Zero" no idea if they are any good, or if the sidewalls are as soft as cheese like they were that list time i used pirelli. There looks like there might be a continental SP6 that is BMW, but for what car? What works well on a rear wheel drive car with 300hp, might not work so will on a front wheel drive car with 265bhp. If BMW say, anything with BMW is fine, even if its "designed" for a completely different platform, then the whole star marked argument largely goes out of the window, no?

Its not like you can take tyres back and swap them if you dont like them. your either stuck with them, or you bin £xxx x4 and start again.
 
Caporegime
Joined
20 Jan 2005
Posts
45,766
Location
Co Durham
i guess that make sense when the car is new, but when its, say 5 years old, is OE still "better than aftermarket"?

If they ever build my BMW 1 series, it comes with some bridgestones S005s, which everyone says are rubbish. the only Star marked options are the "Pirelli P Zero" no idea if they are any good, or if the sidewalls are as soft as cheese like they were that list time i used pirelli. There looks like there might be a continental SP6 that is BMW, but for what car? What works well on a rear wheel drive car with 300hp, might not work so will on a front wheel drive car with 265bhp. If BMW say, anything with BMW is fine, even if its "designed" for a completely different platform, then the whole star marked argument largely goes out of the window, no?

Its not like you can take tyres back and swap them if you dont like them. your either stuck with them, or you bin £xxx x4 and start again.
You are right. Any tyre is fine so long as they fit and are the right size but somebody was saying the * BMW are no different tyres when in fact, there is a massive difference in them

yes chances are they will cost more so have a choice just like with any tyre for your car.
 
Back
Top Bottom