Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 33,188
Watched Ex Machina tonight, caught somewhere between the extremes in this thread. Ultimately it didn't really actually get to an answer of what Eva was. NO questions answered, which I felt made the film relatively pointless. it also felt very predictable throughout.
No where near as bad as Chappie, but not really good either. At least it attempted to sound intelligent even when it wasn't being so, where as Chappie just threw up some tech language in an incoherent mess throughout the film.
4/10.... maybe.
Jupiter Ascending was also utter tripe, yes it had more 'action' so had things to visibly watch happening while most of Ex Machina was two people sitting in one room or another generally trying to sound smart but saying nothing at all. But the plot, most of the acting, the script were all horrific in that film. THe action was all rubbish, space ships fighting in atmosphere but really mostly just a big mess of modern hollywood constantly changing angles crap to watch action. It felt closer to a big budget tv movie than a hollywood film from an acting/script standpoint, painfully cringeworthy.
Just Before I Go, I also watched that the other day, much better film than the other three. Not brilliant, some not great acting, but the stupid brother(the cop) had some funny moments and while he's in almost everything these days he's a great actor(though no where near his best in this) who I just love to see in anything. There was enough funny moments, a decent cast. I mean it was a 5-6/10 and very watchable, no hint of genius there or anything but a story that made sense and some believable characters put it a step above the other three films.
They never really answered in any way if she was a AI or just a well programmed robot. She/it could have simply been programmed to escape. It kept trying to sound intelligent but really wasn't. It felt like an incomplete film, which started with the premise of 'is this an AI' and finished with the 'something escaped from the sex robot lab a weird alcoholic billionaire built and decided to trap the guy that helped it without explanation'.
Pretty location when they showed it, decent actors, incomplete story and often poor writing.
Pretty location when they showed it, decent actors, incomplete story and often poor writing.
No where near as bad as Chappie, but not really good either. At least it attempted to sound intelligent even when it wasn't being so, where as Chappie just threw up some tech language in an incoherent mess throughout the film.
4/10.... maybe.
Jupiter Ascending was also utter tripe, yes it had more 'action' so had things to visibly watch happening while most of Ex Machina was two people sitting in one room or another generally trying to sound smart but saying nothing at all. But the plot, most of the acting, the script were all horrific in that film. THe action was all rubbish, space ships fighting in atmosphere but really mostly just a big mess of modern hollywood constantly changing angles crap to watch action. It felt closer to a big budget tv movie than a hollywood film from an acting/script standpoint, painfully cringeworthy.
Just Before I Go, I also watched that the other day, much better film than the other three. Not brilliant, some not great acting, but the stupid brother(the cop) had some funny moments and while he's in almost everything these days he's a great actor(though no where near his best in this) who I just love to see in anything. There was enough funny moments, a decent cast. I mean it was a 5-6/10 and very watchable, no hint of genius there or anything but a story that made sense and some believable characters put it a step above the other three films.
Last edited: