Roadhouse (1989) - 8/10 - Ah the classic, the phrase "lightning in a bottle" gets used often and think it explains this film perfectly. If you step back look at the film dispassionately, then it really "shouldn't" be the massive success that it is - the story is effectively just a Western in a different setting (new Sheriff comes in to clean up a rough town etc) and its fairly low budget with just a handful of "big" stunts etc - but some magical X-Factor makes this film way more than sum of its parts. A lot of that is down to the casting all around but "something" between the script (which would be laughable if delivered/shown differently), the actors & the sheer "Eighties'ness" of it just clicks so well and its fantastic to watch.
Roadhouse 2 - 2/10 - A straight to bargain basement VHS/DVD film written (I'm almost 100% sure) without originally being a "roadhouse" sequel until some coked up Sony exec fancied a cash grab. Literally everything about this film, bar 1 redeeming part, is utter dog poop, unworthy of the Roadhouse" name, from the cast, direction, story etc. That 1 redeeming factor is watching Gary Busey's son Jake channel his dad for a few scenes of the most wild eyed unhinged bad guy lunacy. Sadly he's really only allowed to let rip a few times but thats fun to see.
Roadhouse (2024) - 5/10 - This is a pointless remake, unneeded, unwanted, unrequested by anyone and that sentiment shows through with a lack of love from those who made this. With that out of the way its, at absolute best, a barely OK film. Someone I saw had used the term "OK for 2024" which is a damning indictment on the state of modern films but feels accurate. It's inoffensive (despite the backlash its receiving), but you can quickly tell its nothing more than a pay-check film for everyone involved. Yes there's nods and winks to the OG film buts thats all it is, nods and winks "hey, remember the name of the old bar, well here is a sign with the same words, ahh, ahhhhhhh, ahhhhhhhhhh - [Peter Griffin]Roadhouse[/Peter Griffin]" with the script and casting being particularly poor. Gyllenhaal is the best thing on screen and he's just "there" for the film, not doing much just being himself almost, probably the easiest job he's ever had outside of the physical requirements. In the end, if this hadn't been a remake, had dropped the film name and character name etc it'd have been a very generic film no-one really cared about, so adding that "target" to your back with the film and character name is just stupid, as the backlash/remember-berries enures that it'll never get a "fair" review unless its its a 9/10 film, which this just isn't even close to.