I’d like to hear some more information about the two Acer IPS monitors. Finding anything online is like hunting hen’s teeth, while the monitors are available to buy.
£375 for an IPS 144hz with FreeSync is very tempting, but not if they use panels unsuitable for high refresh, or the FreeSync range is 44-75hz or something daft.
And what is the difference between the cheaper and more expensive models?
Edit - the more expensive model appears to support hdr400. Does that mean it has a different panel? Also one reviewer on the rainforest mentions they need to disable FreeSync to enable HDR. What’s that all about?
From what I can understand on the more expensive model you have to disable adaptive sync on NVIDIA cards to enable H.D.R, not sure what the case is for A.M.D.
I just watched a difficult to follow review of the Aorus (same panel same H.D.R 400 as the Acer) in Filpino with some broken English on H.D.R, "the sad part is its not what I expected." Its in line with other reviews on H.D.R 400 not being a worth while feature.
The Acer does not have any detailed reviews, the Aorus has one from hardware unboxed, downside was a slower grey to grey response time 'giving the panel the feel of 120 hz monitor.' Reviewer seemed to think this was down to gigabytes implementation of overdrive and could be improved.
Free sync range is fine, cheaper model has the same panel as the more expensive model, 10 bit support is limited to a 120 hz and it does not support H.D.R Grey to Grey response time is unknown but seems to be in line with Aorus from report.
Its a punt, best outcome would be good image quality/ color with a compromise, an 'acceptable response' time and improvement over older panels but not the fastest at £370. i.e effectively its a 120 h.z monitor with 10 bit support, more color with more pop.
Worst outcome, response is not acceptable or q.c is poor and may require a return.
Update: I will have one at the weekend, give a shout if it has any issues.