Hmmmmm. I always thought you were a bit of a **** bloke
I'm wondering what that word hashed out is!
Didn't know "awesome" was offensive.
Weird. Didn't hash it out on mine!
Hmmmmm. I always thought you were a bit of a **** bloke
And that film is about American meat production so is irrelevant to the UK animal standards.
The OP used the RSPCA link earlier to try and push welfare issues but failed to state it was the RSPCA Australia site.
Other countries have crap animal welfare standards, we know this and we can do nothing more than ensure we don't buy imported meat from those countries. It's disingenuous to use foreign practices to further your point.
Posters should be genuine and use examples of sanctioned UK practices.
Cows-in-calf are not slaughtered so this is a pile of nonsense unless for very rare humane reasons like severe injury and it would be cruel to keep them alive and suffering. Do you agree this would be acceptable?
Your source is the RSPCA in AUSTRALIA. Tell me how that relates to the UK and how our practices are the same?
Not only that but plants are living things. By eating plants one is killing. I have no problem with people being Vegetarian or Vegan but they hold zero morale high ground as they are killing just as much if not more then the meat eaters. It always amazes me how many vegetarians don't realize what they are eating was alive and they are killing a living thing. Not all of them but a lot of them don't stop to think what they are eating was alive until they kill it.
I’d stop wasting your time with the links, I doubt anyones actually reading them. I’m certainly not.Yea thats was my bad I was in a rush this morning. but then comparing the practices, they're pretty much the same anyway, except we don't beat baby male cows to death or shoot them on the farm anymore, we send them down the road to a slaughterhouse instead. https://www.theguardian.com/comment...scary-public-farming-calves-pens-alternatives
Do you think chopping of a pigs tail, "trimming" its teeth, then have it live inside for 5months then being gassed to death is "humane"? or "high welfare"?
Undercover footage of UK farming - https://www.landofhopeandglory.org/
+1cause i like meat.
She's a good hen. She's actually named from Claudia from dragon prince TV show.What a beaut, we're gonna rescue some chickens one day, people always give them funny old school names.
No, no they're not. You only have to look at how we farm beef, for example, and compare that to the states to realise that we have a lot higher standards.....but then comparing the practices, they're pretty much the same anyway....
Yea thats was my bad I was in a rush this morning. but then comparing the practices, they're pretty much the same anyway, except we don't beat baby male cows to death or shoot them on the farm anymore, we send them down the road to a slaughterhouse instead. https://www.theguardian.com/comment...scary-public-farming-calves-pens-alternatives
Welfare legislation says that calves should only be held in solitary pens until they are eight weeks old, but Animal Equality claims that the battery calves it photographed at Grange Dairy in Dorset are up to six months old – too large for their hutches– and say that some have grazes on their backs. But trading standard officers say there is no evidence of any breach of animal welfare requirements
A mother cow only produces milk when she gets pregnant. So, starting from the age of 15 months, she will usually be artificially inseminated. Farmers mechanically draw semen from a bull, and then force the female cow into a narrow trap, known as a “cattle crush”, where they will brutally impregnate her.
When she gives birth, her calf will typically be removed within 36 hours, so the farmers can steal and sell you the milk that is meant for her baby.
Following that callous separation, the mother will bellow and scream for days, wondering where her baby is. The answer depends on the gender of the calf. If male, he will probably either be shot and tossed into a bin, or sold to be raised for veal
For at least six months of the year, she will often be confined inside dark sheds
Are you trying to say dairy calves are used for meat? Dairy bulls aren't generally used for meat. They are genetically geared differently. And thus usually just despatched.Hardly an unbiased story. It's full of emotionally charged language to draw outrage from people who have no actual lived experiences of farming.
From the article:
So we have Animal Equality who have an agenda claiming a breach and we have officials from Trading Standards rebutting this claim. Hardly damning
Emotionally charged language and, the fact the writer has to use "female cow" (all cows are female) shows lack of knowledge.
Also using the "her baby" is used to draw the reader into humanising the calf by drawing on maternal and paternal instincts of the reader.
A crush is used as it prevents injury for both the animal and the workers.
Crap. I have already addressed this advising what happens to bull calves. They are certainly not shot and put in the bin. They exist the same as heifer (female) calves and then sold into beef herds to be raised for beef.
Yes, they are over-wintered in sheds as the fields are in no condition to support them over Winter in UK due to the weather. Would they have them standing in the freezing conditions in deep mud all day?
The sheds have raised bays usually with straw or sawdust to lie on. A field is wet and muddy over Winter.
I will stop here otherwise this post could be much much longer as the Guardian article can be ripped to shreds by anyone who even has the slightest of knowledge, something the writer does not.
You should do yourself a favour and go visit an animal operation (beef, sheep, dairy etc) and get some actual first hand experience rather than reading heavily biased articles where the writer is either lazy, has an agenda or both.
It may benefit others here too.
Oh, TLDR - linked Guardian article is full of crap.
Do you think chopping of a pigs tail, "trimming" its teeth, then have it live inside for 5months then being gassed to death is "humane"? or "high welfare"?
Undercover footage of UK farming - https://www.landofhopeandglory.org/
Yea soz I was in a rush this morning didn't check it properly, but then are the standard practices really that much different?
Ive seen reports from other countries that do slaughter pregnant cows, but if we don't that's a minor plus I guess.
I'm a meat eater but this argument is so stupid and I keep hearing it. Seriously come up with something better.If we stop eating meat, imagine all those animals which will now not exist and have no chance of life at all. Is that even more cruel, at least the current way they have some life. Who are we to judge if the life is worthy?
Are you trying to say dairy calves are used for meat? Dairy bulls aren't generally used for meat. They are genetically geared differently. And thus usually just despatched.
I'm not sure how many go for beef. But I know it isn't many.
How finishing dairy bull calves is profiting an arable farm - Farmers Weekly
Buying “waste” dairy bull calves and finishing them on low-cost feed and crop waste is helping to keep feed costs low while improving arable ground. Eachwww.fwi.co.uk
Edit: I'm hoping no one twists the word "waste" with actual garbage thrown away. Bull calves are "waste" for a dairy herd but that doesn't mean they are disposed off like rubbish as you'll see in the article
I Used to work with dairy farmers and I know a lot were despatched. But it was a few years ago. Been reading this is much reduced now. I'll ask my dairy work friend (auditing farms) how things are now.
Looks like been quite a bit of change when in the last couple of years
Regardless. I'll is much much better than much of the world. That's a given. You don't have to look far too see standards just go out the window.