I have a pair of B&W MM1s that I use for PC sound connected via usb. Would that work if I connected to the monitor? Assuming it has usb ports.
I use Adam A5X's and simply connect them to my STX II soundcard. Nothing connected to the AW3423DW
Thanks for the reply. Was looking how to get sound if a firestick was plugged into the monitor. Might wait for a UW Oled that has built in speakers as I don't want to change my MM1s and I don't want 2 sets of speakers.
At least on the G-sync version there is a line out on the back of the monitor as well as the headphone jack on the underside of the monitor. You should be able to use that line out on the back to a set of speakers.
I'm in the same boat about 8 bit and 10 bit. I can't see a difference, but can very slightly see the small near black gamma raise that happens when changing from 175 to 144 (it is very small but i can at least see the difference, it starts to become more obvious at 120hz and is in your face at 60hz
)
I'm in the same boat about 8 bit and 10 bit. I can't see a difference, but can very slightly see the small near black gamma raise that happens when changing from 175 to 144 (it is very small but i can at least see the difference, it starts to become more obvious at 120hz and is in your face at 60hz
But it is this topic that is showing me that people must see very different to one another as I see a lot of people choose to run at 144hz as the change from 10bit vs 8 bit must be noticeable and important enough to override the small gamma raise and the lower fps. They don't notice the gamma raise, i don't notice the 10 bit to 8 bit change. So, if someone recommends 144hz 10 bit as better PQ, i have to balance it from the people sensitive to black levels side. in my camp 175hz has better fps and is actually the better PQ.
www.reddit.com
Well I think its also differentiation in terms of use cases? For HDR the gpu uses FRC/dithering anyway which indeed most reviewers seemed to suggest it wouldn't be noticeable to most. If you wanted to use 10 bit for work purposes that isn't HDR then I think that's where the issues come in? I remember there being a debate about how AMD allow you to enable 10bit dithering in the driver settings normally but nvidia doesn't so you'd need to select 10bit on the monitor, unless that's actually been changed anyway. Of course not many applications actually support 10 bit colour(unless it's for HDR purposes), so the use cases for this is likely very specific and probably limited to things like image editing, video editing or so on. Use cases which you might not use this monitor for anyway, since I wouldn't say a curved screen is ideal for that kind of work anyway.By all accounts the F seems to be able to go to 120Hz in 10-bit and the non-F can go to 144Hz. The FRC that I mentioned above is certainly used by NVIDIA which is apparently so good that most normal humans can't see the difference between 8-bit and 10-bit. There are, however, small shifts in other things between refresh rates that people are perhaps confusing with differences between 8-bit and 10-bit. I don't know about AMD but judging by other comments they are the same. I think the real problem here is that people are expecting 8-bit to carry significantly comtain less dynamic range but this simply isn't the case, the FRC takes care of that.
Oh, by the way, there are now several confirmations that the F will run at 120Hz 10-bit, just in case there are still some people worrying about it.
Reddit - Dive into anything
Good luck lol
