I don't like that test image, presumably provided from one of the early Chinese reviews of something, it's misleading? While i agree that an OLED can provide better motion clarity than an LCD, they've not captured the real world performance there, certainly not of the LCD. The UFO test pattern they've used is not the one designed for pursuit camera testing for a start and does not include the guidance lines designed by Blurbusters to make capturing these photos accurate. The test really designed for pursuit camera photos is the one with the different coloured green backgrounds
here. This is assuming what they were attempting to capture is perceived real life motion clarity and blurring levels.
You can tell from the image that it's not capturing it properly, as you don't get the ghost images like that in a proper pursuit camera test photo, it would instead look blurred rather than having ghost images.
Here's a good example of a proper pursuit camera photo from a 170Hz IPS panel from the
AOC AGON Pro AG274QXM. That's how a real pursuit camera photo should work and is a proper representation of perceived motion clarity.