Years ago i triumphed FM2 on OcUK in the forums and i took a lot of stick on here for it, yep sucked up all the hype going and in general it dissapointed me when the game released particular its single player.
Now here we are with FM3, will i make the same mistake, hell no.
Yet now if somone mentions something not so good, or questions a decision on the direction the game is going look what happens...
I expressed it seemed a new direction was being taken for more mass appeal yet doesnt seem to improve the direction towards more sim features, that was the basis of weather/amount of cars topic. It wasnt meant as a direct GT comparison even though those feature may be in that game or indeed other games will have it.
No the point was why FM3 didnt and i asked to be shown just what FM3 had showcased to take the game to the next level regards the sim racing community, please do enlighten me?
Their i go being negative again because i have a concern....
Some of you arnt taking it as system wars discussion and i didnt say all of you were but these forums are very prone to it. Its inevetible people will compare like for like games, ive even referred to SHIFT ias well and guess what it could turn out to be the surprise racing package of the three.
Also james i wish youd get your facts right as i havnt been fully negative at all but it doesnt matter, as your all latching onto this VS thing with someone with an agenda which it wasnt about, its about the love of racing games, discussiing them and yes at times comparing, but not in a bad way.
No more from me on the matter, but i can tell you one thing, FM3 hasnt the most cars, it wont have the most tracks and out of those 100 tracks how many are track variations? Finally it wont sell more neither so Dan The Beard Greenawood can hype it all he wants...
In six months time you can prove me right or wrong....
