What film did you watch last night?
- Thread starter Richeh
- Start date
Infidelus
Infidelus
Cockneys vs Zombies. Made me laugh out loud a couple of times. Pure cheese of course, but mildly entertaining if you like zombie flicks.
Saw this last night, was ok i guess. No better no worse than the first one with Toby Maguire. Bit pointless really, this 'reboot' thing needs to die a death
Soldato
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 8,368
- Location
- The Land of Roundabouts
Safety Not Guaranteed Hour and half well spent imo, 7/10
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Mar 2012
- Posts
- 3,009
- Location
- Canberra
Very good film. I found Ip Man 2 to be quite lame in comparison and a bit over the top. Consider that a warning
Very good film. I found Ip Man 2 to be quite lame in comparison and a bit over the top. Consider that a warning
I absolutely agree with you on this. It was such a let down after the first.
Amazing Spiderman.
6/10.
How they could justify making this movie after the previous set of Spiderman movies - I have no idea. I guess it was a commercial decision and the movie did make money at the Box Office.
Comparing Spiderman (1), with Tobey Maguire (TB), to this - the TB movie was much better. The special FX in this movie are of the same level as seen in Jurrassic Park, 19 years ago, which is not good for a comic book movie. The storyline concentrates far too much on love between teenagers (I have no interest in teenage love stories) and the action isn't particularly great.
Most of the time, I prefer the "newer" version, as SFX normally improve with age and action movie making techniques also improve. But this movie wouldn't be out of place had it been released 15 years ago. In fact, 15 years ago. Perhaps the movie was made an a low budget - I have no idea.
Is this an "ok" film - yes.
Is it better than the original Spiderman - no.
Am I disappointed - definitely.
6/10.
How they could justify making this movie after the previous set of Spiderman movies - I have no idea. I guess it was a commercial decision and the movie did make money at the Box Office.
Comparing Spiderman (1), with Tobey Maguire (TB), to this - the TB movie was much better. The special FX in this movie are of the same level as seen in Jurrassic Park, 19 years ago, which is not good for a comic book movie. The storyline concentrates far too much on love between teenagers (I have no interest in teenage love stories) and the action isn't particularly great.
Most of the time, I prefer the "newer" version, as SFX normally improve with age and action movie making techniques also improve. But this movie wouldn't be out of place had it been released 15 years ago. In fact, 15 years ago. Perhaps the movie was made an a low budget - I have no idea.
Is this an "ok" film - yes.
Is it better than the original Spiderman - no.
Am I disappointed - definitely.
Yep.
Associate
- Joined
- 3 Dec 2011
- Posts
- 167
- Location
- North West
Live Free Die Hard
6/10 its not bad.
6/10 its not bad.
Soldato
- Joined
- 4 Aug 2008
- Posts
- 4,936
- Location
- Manchester.
Looper 7/10
Too much sky movies 007..
I hit the sack as the 00.25 film starts, been nearly a month of it, skyfall next
Course, been great to go back and see how good dalton was as bond, of all the repeats, the ones you see the least.
Good film the living daylights.
I hit the sack as the 00.25 film starts, been nearly a month of it, skyfall next
Course, been great to go back and see how good dalton was as bond, of all the repeats, the ones you see the least.
Good film the living daylights.