It is a bad graphics card for any resolution.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
*** AMD "Navi 3X" (RDNA 3 discussion thread) ***
- Thread starter 4K8KW10
- Start date
-
- Tags
- amd radeon navi 3x rdna 3
It is a bad graphics card for any resolution.
Caporegime
No, the 128-bit memory interface tanks the performance to pretty much useless levels:
Battlefield 2042 Open Beta Benchmark Test & Performance Review - Performance & VRAM Usage | TechPowerUp
The performance difference is different literally every time you change servers and how many accounts does he have? the game gets locked out of your origin account everytime you change GPU's, that's 10 accounts.
There's no way AMD is going to give the 7600XT performance on a level with a 6900XT considering the current 6600XT only got the performance of a 5700XT while also costing more.
My guess is that this will be the 7700XT and the 7600XT performance will land Between a 6700XT and 6800 non XT.
My guess is that this will be the 7700XT and the 7600XT performance will land Between a 6700XT and 6800 non XT.
Soldato
Little bit dramatic.
You wouldn't be using this card for 4k, like you wouldn't be using a 3060 for 4k.
The 6600XT easily beats out the 3060 at 1080p
But not for 600 euros. Never!
This card should cost 150 euros, and they charge 4 times more! The scalpers!
Soldato
Well yes, the issue is cost not performance. Performance is between a 2070 super/3060 and a 2080/3060ti.
I would say the card 'should' be sold for $279 to $329. MSRP is what $379? Street price is $400 to $600 dollars here.
References:
580 was $229 on release
1060 was $250 on release
RTX 2060 was $349 on release (which was kinda where prices were ramping up by Nvidia taking the royal P with things.).
The lack of a decent amount of cache and low bus has potential to be an issue for future games though, take farcry 6 for example where it's barely faster than a 5600XT.
Caporegime
Its a 128 bit memory controller dGPU,and only has 32MB of Infinity Cache(AMD themselves indicated that 64MB is ideal for 1080p),so it realistically should have been priced at most around $279 for the base models,which was the RX5600XT price.
That would at least yield around a 33% generation on generation improvement. You should ideally targetting at least around 30% to 40% performance improvements per generation. For example the RTX3060TI was around a 36% improvement over the RTX2060 Super.
Last edited:
Soldato
I was accounting for inflation. Cheaper would be better, and it is clear it is a VERYYYYY heavily budget made card. Stripping down to 8 lanes and 128bit is the extreme clear indication of this.
Soldato
But the other 6 series cards are just as bad if not worse.
MSRP looks to be 369 euros, so the cheapest one is not quite double the cost.
MSRP looks to be 369 euros, so the cheapest one is not quite double the cost.
Someone should give data about how many consumers who had been previously considered budget conscious and enthusiasts can now buy with these scalper prices.
This is a card that should be entry level, but is charged with the enthusiast level pricings.
Soldato
All I know is, both Nvidia and AMD must be extremely happy right now.
Like torturing someone and be happy for your crime. Very low ethics and mindset. It betrays the whole gaming community.
The gamers will return "the favour" multiple times. Resulting in potential heavy sanctions for the criminals.
I wonder if they mean 5 or 6. Or maybe early batches on 6nm then later ones on 5nm.
Another FE card for me then. I ain't paying no middle man to scalp me. Happy to go AMD if they can do what Nvidia do with the FE and deliver MSRP prices.