Soldato
So it's going to have a 4" screen, a better battery and a new connector, that's it then right?
Likely a new (A6) quad core processor, increased RAM and NFC as well.
EDIT: Didnt see the post above, woops.
So it's going to have a 4" screen, a better battery and a new connector, that's it then right?
Apple really needs some innovation now, a bigger screen, a bigger battery and a new power point are not exactly leading the field.
What exactly do you want on the next iPhone?
What exactly do you expect? And surely that's the point of new models, to upgrade the old models? We're not going to see a holographic iPhone just yet.Apple really needs some innovation now, a bigger screen, a bigger battery and a new power point are not exactly leading the field.
With phones, what is the "best" phone is more down to the interface rather than the features, seeing as so many features are provided by apps now. Hardware features aren't quite as important as they used to be, and most devices nowadays have a very similar feature-set. Many feel that the iPhone is the best phone...the sales suggest that. Not saying that it is, just saying that one person's preference can be another's pet hate. It's all about the user experience, and it's vital to Apple, as well as its customers, that the iPhone continues to feel like an iPhone - it needs to be familiar. As for AirPlay, what does that have to do with it? AirPlay works on devices that are pretty old (3GS and second gen iPod touch), and the fact that it doesn't work on your MBP isn't an issue with features, it's a bug or other problem. Nothing to do with profit margins or anything. Siri would have been a better example; personally I think it's disgusting that iPad 2 owners don't get the feature.If it were the best phone, which is simply isn't or provided a breadth of capability unmatched I would be less concerned, but at the moment I do feel I am getting my plonker pulled, such as with the latest AirPlay not working on my Mid 2010 MacBook pro when my old iPhone 4 does. I'm all for innovation and the need to upgrade sometimes but that, even for someone who can go an buy each new model if he wishes is a bit to much take in, I feel like I am being played a little to support the profit margins...
Far too many people miss the point of the 911 range. Much like above, what do people expect? You have a car that is more technically capable than its predecessor, you have updated infotainment and other gadgets on the inside, and design changes (whether that be major or minor). Besides, if Porsche were to create an incredible turbo four-pot that could reliably produce 650hp day-in, day-out to go into the next the next GT2, I'm sure that many customers would be pretty peeved at such an "innovation" Like the iPhone, a 911 needs to continue being a 911 - huge changes and major innovation could risk taking some of that away. The electronic power steering, while not an innovation as such, is just one example of this that, in the opinion of some.I say this as someone who has defended Porsche's new 911 models and their apparent lack of innovation..
As above, what do you expect? What else can they really add? People seem to love complaining yet cannot come up with anything themselves. The quad core processor debate is one that I won't get into as it isn't on the surface, and I largely agree with you that there is little reason for it right now, though if Apple don't, people may complain (without knowing any better at all). As for the taller display, that could again be said about any display; you've essentially said that "a bigger display gives you more space". Surely that's the point?Whilst I'm not discounting the possibility that, as last year with the 4S, all these rumours are baseless and the 5 will be totally different, if it does turn out to be what we're all now expecting, I'm seriously underwhelmed.
The 4S was an incremental upgrade, just as the 3GS was, and that was fine. There's no need for a radical change every 12-18 months and Apple knew full well that, with the 4 still so popular, all they really needed to do was update it a little.
But now we're looking at another incremental upgrade. A larger one that with the 4S maybe, but still fairly small.
I don't really see the point of a taller screen. All the screen icons and furniture will still be the same size, merely offering a little more vertical space for apps that can utilise it. In exchange for this we'll get a taller and more cumbersome phone that won't fit in pockets quite as easily. Really don't see why they're bothering - it's almost as if it's just so they can claim a 4" screen for the device and try to placate all those who've been moaning that the existing screen is too small.
What else are we going to get? Quad-core processor? What's the point in that? The 4S is more than quick enough and a quad core CPU just reduces battery life. NFC? We're so far away from this becoming prevalent in the UK that we'll all be two or three models of phone further on by then.
Unless I'm missing something, I really can't see why anyone would bother upgrading from a 4S, or even a 4.
What exactly do you expect? And surely that's the point of new models, to upgrade the old models? We're not going to see a holographic iPhone just yet.
With phones, what is the "best" phone is more down to the interface rather than the features, seeing as so many features are provided by apps now. Hardware features aren't quite as important as they used to be, and most devices nowadays have a very similar feature-set. Many feel that the iPhone is the best phone...the sales suggest that. Not saying that it is, just saying that one person's preference can be another's pet hate.
It's all about the user experience, and it's vital to Apple, as well as its customers, that the iPhone continues to feel like an iPhone - it needs to be familiar.
As for AirPlay, what does that have to do with it? AirPlay works on devices that are pretty old (3GS and second gen iPod touch), and the fact that it doesn't work on your MBP isn't an issue with features, it's a bug or other problem. Nothing to do with profit margins or anything. Siri would have been a better example; personally I think it's disgusting that iPad 2 owners don't get the feature.
Far too many people miss the point of the 911 range. Much like above, what do people expect? You have a car that is more technically capable than its predecessor, you have updated infotainment and other gadgets on the inside, and design changes (whether that be major or minor). Besides, if Porsche were to create an incredible turbo four-pot that could reliably produce 650hp day-in, day-out to go into the next the next GT2, I'm sure that many customers would be pretty peeved at such an "innovation" Like the iPhone, a 911 needs to continue being a 911 - huge changes and major innovation could risk taking some of that away. The electronic power steering, while not an innovation as such, is just one example of this that, in the opinion of some.
As above, what do you expect? What else can they really add? People seem to love complaining yet cannot come up with anything themselves. The quad core processor debate is one that I won't get into as it isn't on the surface, and I largely agree with you that there is little reason for it right now, though if Apple don't, people may complain (without knowing any better at all). As for the taller display, that could again be said about any display; you've essentially said that "a bigger display gives you more space". Surely that's the point?
And frankly, there is little reason to upgrade to the 5, as you've said. However, with most on two year contracts, it works well for everyone; 4S users will get a huge upgrade next year with the next iPhone after the 5, and iPhone 4 users get a nice upgrade now with the 5.
I don't pretend to know but it's up to them to innovate and it just feels like they've run out of ideas themselves now. It's starting to feel like the 4 was the peak of iPhone development in terms of hardware and design and it might be a bit downhill from here with only small incremental changes to that basic design.As above, what do you expect? What else can they really add?
As for the taller display, that could again be said about any display; you've essentially said that "a bigger display gives you more space". Surely that's the point?
And frankly, there is little reason to upgrade to the 5, as you've said. However, with most on two year contracts, it works well for everyone; 4S users will get a huge upgrade next year with the next iPhone after the 5, and iPhone 4 users get a nice upgrade now with the 5.
Okay, I think that my main point of view has come across a bit...off, probably because of my perspective reading your post.
I should say that I don't buy Apple products because I am an Apple fanboy - I'm really not. I didn't even bother going for the iPhone first; I went Android beforehand, but moved to the iPhone because I didn't like the Android experience. Similarly, I was brought up as a Mac user, then decided to go the Windows route, having used plenty of Windows machines but not owned one. However, I didn't like it, even though I was perfectly used to it, hence the move back to the Mac.
Also worth noting that I don't fall for the Apple marketing hyperbole. The term "retina" just frustrates me, and I only really upgrade when I find something that I really could do with. As a result, I have no plans to upgrade my 4S for a long time, probably a few years from purchase (another two years).
I'm not what you would call a avid member of the community. I see your name all the time Housey, however it's difficult for me to distinguish who are the more Apple people, and who aren't
My post was saying, "there's only so much that Apple can do", rather than "Apple can only do right". We read so many rubbish comments about how the next iPhone is exactly the same, etc, when the fact is that every company churns out a new model that is, at the core, very similar to the predecessor. Because of Apple's fundamentals, most of the things that you said you would like to see, as we both know, simply won't happen. That aside, it leaves very little that Apple can and will really do. People will complain that the new phone is the same (even though they don't know what they want to see), yet they will complain if the new phone doesn't turn up. It's a lose-lose situation, in a way.
Of course, everything is about profit. My comment was referring to AirPlay exclusively, which I thought was not an example because I didn't realise it was incompatible. Apologies for that.
Sorry if I came across as a bit brash. I've read too many posts recently saying that the 5 will suck merely because the changes are minor, without posters really thinking logically about it. I say much the same when iPhone users slate Android on other forums - it's about being objective, as you have said.
The last part of my post was aimed at Vertigo, by the way
I've never once wished for a larger screen on my iPhone nor have I ever had any problem reading anything on it. The only real use I can see for a large screen is if you watch a lot of video or do a lot of web browsing, neither of which apply to me. I want a phone which is relatively small and pocketable, not a miniature tablet!
I'd like them to innovate as they tell me they prefer to own that rather than putting it into the hands of the users so would like them to surprise me like they have in the past.
I want a phone that doesn't need a case to work effectively, as my iPhone 4 does. I would like a device that is maybe half the weight so I can pop it in a suit pocket without it pulling. I would like an edgeless screen with no wasted real estate and I would like more customisation of the OS so I can change what appears on my home screen. I'd like something that works with my Zeppelin (both small and big) works with my Monitor Audio iDock and doesnt need me to invest in more connectors to make it work with them. I'd like a memory card slot so I can add my own memory with any content I might chose and I would like double the batter life.
These are just some things.
But only gives you additional space in one dimension, which seems a bit daft. It feels like they didn't want to make it any wider as that would compromise the design too much but wanted to make it bigger so it would compete more in terms of specs.
We don't want to Apple to end up being dragged into the same silly specs/price race and end up compromising their product the way that other manufacturers do.
Most of those don't sound like very innovative features to me; that'd just be copying what someone else has already done.
Sadly, that's the world we live in where ignorant people demand nothing more than specs, specs, specs. That's how we ended up with high end Android phones with mega specs that still don't offer the sort of experience the iPhone does. We don't want to Apple to end up being dragged into the same silly specs/price race and end up compromising their product the way that other manufacturers do.