This from some one on the guardian's live coverage:
"Rob, why is it the transfer fee seems to be the only thing anybody considers when deciding whether a player has cost a club the 'right' amount?" asks Anthony Hulse. "The transfer fee is probably less than 50% of the overall cost of a player to a club. As a young player who is not a fully established "star", there is every chance Carroll's wage demands (he's currently on £27k per week) would be considerably lower than an established star who might on the face of it justify £35m.
You can't just say £35m is a stupid fee without knowing what the wages would be. £35m at £50k per week (hypothetically, but it would still pretty much double what he's on at the moment) is probably actually very good business." I think he's an enormous talent, Anthony. We'll see if he's worth it.
......
IF this is right it not be that bad if Carroll is not on mega wages