January Transfer Window 2010/2011 Season Rumours/Signings

dannyjo22 said:
I don't believe that for a minute. Football fans like to believe that crap but the men paying the bills will look at it completely differently.

They will see it as money saved in a 2 for 1 deal.

Instead of spending 30 million on Adams and Suarez they have probably spent 5-10 million depending on what chelsea pay for Suarez and Carroll. It could be less than 20 million saved but I doubt it's going in any transfer pot.
Click to expand...

We shall see, they just paid another red sox player 140million dollars in a 4 year deal.
Who doesn't like shooting another club down though ;D
 
MofoKilla said:
best strike in the prem ?? hardly evon on form i wouldnt say he was the best in league :p
Click to expand...

He has a better goals/games ratio than Drogba iirc despite playing in a much worse team over the last couple of years. Rooney just is no where near as clinical / good imo.
 
Tom84 said:
No he wouldn't, as proved with Heinze he wanted to join Liverpool and we flat out refused to sell to them. Same would have applied to Ronaldo

:D
Click to expand...

If they'd offered 80mil for Heinze Fergie would have driven him there himself ;)

guyfawkes5 said:
Repeated statements from highers-up in FIFA/UEFA have said they fully intend to if the clubs carry on and try to call their bluff.
Click to expand...

elmuzzy66. said:
Do not see uefa banning the top clubs. Who would want watch a cl without those teams?
Click to expand...

Actually, I had a quick look at the rules, it refers to another manual to see what the punishments would be, a bit of googling and Uefa haven't writen the punishment/sanctions regulations and rules yet. They know how they are going to get the financial info, how its collected, what loss you can have and why etc, but they haven't actually decided what to DO with that info yet :p

Seems to be, warnings, sanctions, fines, bigger fines and banning from competitions. Though I would think if you're 80mil with losses they'll start somewhere higher up the chain.

I think the general idea is less to punish clubs, but more to give the top clubs a reason to not(by then) be paying 400k a week for the top star that year, which could be very good for the game. Its a bargaining chip to say to squad members, we can't afford to pay you 250k a week anymore, but theres no point leaving, NO ONE can afford to pay you 250k a week, unless you are the single star with everyone else on 10k a week and in the relegation zone.

Transfer fee's should become more sane aswell as Real just can't pay 80mil for anyone, ever again.

What it will probably mean is contract renegotiating post 13/14 season will mean pay cuts for a lot of the "biggest" names in football.
 
dannyjo22 said:
I don't believe that for a minute. Football fans like to believe that crap but the men paying the bills will look at it completely differently.

They will see it as money saved in a 2 for 1 deal.

Instead of spending 30 million on Adams and Suarez they have probably spent 5-10 million depending on what chelsea pay for Suarez and Carroll. It could be less than 20 million saved but I doubt it's going in any transfer pot.
Click to expand...

Even after the Carroll and Suarez deals were done, we've been in talks with both Blackpool and Villa trying to sign Adam and Young :confused:
 
Burned_Alive said:
Spurs messageboards must be going into meltdown, Suarez and Carroll both turn down Spurs to join Liverpool, how can it be?!?!?!
Click to expand...
Uh oh. The ITKs will start eating one another to survive.

Andybtsn said:
Sky Sports News are reporting Newcastle have had a £10million bid for Charles N'Zogbia turned down by Wigan. More to follow.
Click to expand...
I SPOKE TOO SOON
 
MofoKilla said:
So torres has 1 good game in every 10 ?

based on last 18 months 35m was over priced imo , time will tell thou i predict he will tear the league up at chelsea :(
Click to expand...

Without doubt, you would presume he'll have renewed motivation now. Just hope Chelsea are too far behind in the league for it to matter this year.
 
I actually think Liverpool might be better off with the two signings they've made than having a forward mope around who doesn't really want to be at the club. It's been obvious all season that Torres didn't want to be there so £50 million is pretty good business imo. I think Carroll will be a really good signing, even though he is overpriced. I'm not so sure about Suarez, only time will tell!
 
Meh, I think Torres is absolutely incredible and has just been playing in front of a team that's not been good enough for him. We'll see how he'll do at Chelski but I think he's amazing tbh.
 
skippi90 said:
We were after an intelligent forward. Clearly, neither of those two are. :p
Click to expand...

Not necessarily their actions mean they will be the most feared partnership in the world, literally, not for goal scoring but still....

Smart moves from both ;)


As for N'zogbia, he might go back to Newcastle with a little contract addition saying he's not to be called Insomnia ever again. Also, they ARE a bigger club than Wigan, by a mile, he did well there, and only left because they got relegated. Realistically it won't happen, Wigan won't stay up without him. AS Holloway put it, that makes him worth 46mil to Wigan, if not anyone else.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom