I believe it will be faster than TXP.
But what worries me is the price they'll charge for it,
How could it? Same chip, less cores, higher clock (easily matched by clocking the Titan XP), less memory..
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I believe it will be faster than TXP.
But what worries me is the price they'll charge for it,
How could it? Same chip, less cores, higher clock (easily matched by clocking the Titan XP), less memory..
How could it? Same chip, less cores, higher clock (easily matched by clocking the Titan XP), less memory..
I just can't get excited for more nvidia overpriced tat.
I believe it will be faster than TXP.
But what worries me is the price they'll charge for it,
Quite a lot of TXP's clock to 2000+, Roughly in the same ball park as the 1080's overclocked clocks so I can't see the "Ti" being faster than the TXP given it's going to have less cores, Less bandwidth and probably clock to around the same as the 1080 and TXP.
Quite a lot of TXP's clock to 2000+, Roughly in the same ball park as the 1080's overclocked clocks so I can't see the "Ti" being faster than the TXP given it's going to have less cores, Less bandwidth and probably clock to around the same as the 1080 and TXP.
Pretty sure most people expect them to be equally fast with the GTX 1080 Ti having higher stock clocks due to having less "cuda cores".If you think the 1080Ti will be faster than the TXP prepare to be disappointed.
And those folks can dream on.I feel we have peaked with this gen.If the 1080Ti can match or even surpass the TXP and cost less that is excellent,but it won't happen.Pretty sure most people expect them to be equally fast with the GTX 1080 Ti having higher stock clocks due to having less "cuda cores".
Pretty sure most people expect them to be equally fast with the GTX 1080 Ti having higher stock clocks due to having less "cuda cores".
Which is exactly why overclocked performance is what should matter.
There's no physical reason TXP couldn't have shipped with the same boost clock as 1080, but 250W is a lot more marketable than 300W, as is 40dB than 50dB.
It's very telling that every Pascal GPU can hit ~2000MHz, and the same could be said of ~1400MHz on Maxwell.
I once read here that if you can afford a TXP you can afford a good cooling solution for it.Tbh I wasn't happy spending the extra cash to cool it but as the previous statement went,if you can afford a TXP you can afford to cool it.Yeah, but lower clocks (and lower TDP) also requires less expensive cooling solutions, which is why anyone buying a TXP should invest in a decent water cooling setup to get the most out of it.
I once read here that if you can afford a TXP you can afford a good cooling solution for it.Tbh I wasn't happy spending the extra cash to cool it but as the previous statement went,if you can afford a TXP you can afford to cool it.
And those folks can dream on.I feel we have peaked with this gen.If the 1080Ti can match or even surpass the TXP and cost less that is excellent,but it won't happen.
Affording and doing is another thing. I have all the cooling bits but currently cooling my CPU with an AIO and cooling my GPU with the stock custom cooler. It can be a chore watercooling and having done it for so long, I can't be bothered to do it for now.
I once read here that if you can afford a TXP you can afford a good cooling solution for it.Tbh I wasn't happy spending the extra cash to cool it but as the previous statement went,if you can afford a TXP you can afford to cool it.