Just deciding on which board. Does the Formula have any benefits over the OC as will be used for sli.
Slot spacing on the formula is pretty tight.
Just deciding on which board. Does the Formula have any benefits over the OC as will be used for sli.
Tell him to go for the x-oc, you simply don't get the features it offers on any other board for that price!
Water and roughly 1.33v should net you 5ghz on one of these
Usually around 1.3v but you may be able to get it lower.
Don't be fooled by the seemingly high voltage, it will run very very cool in comparison to retail chips!
You generally get core temp variances on most multi core chips, should only be of concern if the difference is 8-9c+ in which case its reseat time
How much of a temp drop did you see going from 1.3 to 1.18v? Seems to scale well have you tried out 1.4v yet?
Been playing around with my bundle, tried 4.8 with the standard 1.3v set by ocuk but no luck. But been trying up to 1.35v at 4.8 and still blue screens within 10 secs of prime. Not sure if I need to mess with some of the other settings etc. But it's approaching 1.4v just for 4.8ghz so 5.ghz might be a challenge :S
So guys keep my 4.8Ghz sandy or switch to one of these, what do you think?
The sandy is in a Maximus Extreme V with OCUK's 240mm Fathom cooler.
Regards
Fred
Just tested it with a run on cinebench and got a difference of 8c hmmmm I have re-seated already but just cant see it being a seating issue when it is just 1 core and that core is cooler not hotter?
My 4th core is also always 5-8c cooler than my others. I have used two different coolers, one seated by OCuk.
I believe it's got more to do with your IHS seating than your cooler, and that's done in the factory.. so unless you delid, you're gotta go with that. I guess you could say the IHS is not seated properly on the 3 other cores
Intel processors have a problem with the IHS anyway on ivy and sandy. The contact is not proper due to the glue being used is too thick.