• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Ryzen 3900X thread

Everyone loves a picture :) (still to set up leds and colours!)

complete.jpg


orange.jpg
 
LtMatt said:
They should have an equivalent option. It essentially maxes out the PPT, EDC and TDC values as you can in Ryzen Master Tool so that you achieve the highest possible clocks without manually overclocking.
Click to expand...

Having no luck what so ever with the 1usmus tool, most of the values are lower, but makes things slower, cinebench drops ~50 points.

That being said, an all core 4.275Ghz with 1.325v seems to work a charm from Ryzen Master, but cant get the same from the BIOS. lol
 
Tee Hee Johnson said:
Having no luck what so ever with the 1usmus tool, most of the values are lower, but makes things slower, cinebench drops ~50 points.

That being said, an all core 4.275Ghz with 1.325v seems to work a charm from Ryzen Master, but cant get the same from the BIOS. lol
Click to expand...

You have to remove Ryzen master and flash your BIOS before you use 1usmus powerplan
Also you miss the purpose of the powerplan, is for light loads (aka gaming) not all core benchmarks. With this powerplan I get 4600-4625 on the game that hits the CPU, or in the case of X4, 4575 & 4605 respectively on the 2 cores it uses at 100% and 4300-4500 to the other 8 cores it uses offloading stuff
 
Panos said:
You have to remove Ryzen master and flash your BIOS before you use 1usmus powerplan
Also you miss the purpose of the powerplan, is for light loads (aka gaming) not all core benchmarks. With this powerplan I get 4600-4625 on the game that hits the CPU, or in the case of X4, 4575 & 4605 respectively on the 2 cores it uses at 100% and 4300-4500 to the other 8 cores it uses offloading stuff
Click to expand...
Really? You need to flash your bios? That seems extreme.
 
lnoton said:
Really? You need to flash your bios? That seems extreme.
Click to expand...

Unfortunately. If you want to play games with cores hitting 4600-4625 you either do the painful per core overclock on Ryzen Master, or reset everything, flash bios and put everything by hand.

Imho just wait until the AGESA 1005 is out for your motherboard. You will be flashing it either way :)
 
Panos said:
Unfortunately. If you want to play games with cores hitting 4600-4625 you either do the painful per core overclock on Ryzen Master, or reset everything, flash bios and put everything by hand.

Imho just wait until the AGESA 1005 is out for your motherboard. You will be flashing it either way :)
Click to expand...

I might have misunderstood. I've installed and subsequently uninstalled Ryzen master, but never reflashed my bios and my 2 best cores regularly hit 4600-4650.

I wondered if you were suggesting Ryzen Master does something so screwy that you need to reflash your bios?

I have, since uninstalling Ryzen Master, flipped over to my 2nd BIOS chip and applied the same profile manually, and get the same performance. Ryzen Master hasn't been anywhere near that BIOS chip.
 
Panos said:
You have to remove Ryzen master and flash your BIOS before you use 1usmus powerplan
Also you miss the purpose of the powerplan, is for light loads (aka gaming) not all core benchmarks. With this powerplan I get 4600-4625 on the game that hits the CPU, or in the case of X4, 4575 & 4605 respectively on the 2 cores it uses at 100% and 4300-4500 to the other 8 cores it uses offloading stuff
Click to expand...

Why flash BIOS, I already have and will do when 1.0.0.5 drops.

I'm not using the random powerplan, I was taking about the DRAM Calculator... I didn't know they also had a power plan.

And I am playing with it at the moment, finding out its top all core and then what the better cores can do individually for lighter stuff.
 
lnoton said:
I might have misunderstood. I've installed and subsequently uninstalled Ryzen master, but never reflashed my bios and my 2 best cores regularly hit 4600-4650.

I wondered if you were suggesting Ryzen Master does something so screwy that you need to reflash your bios?

I have, since uninstalling Ryzen Master, flipped over to my 2nd BIOS chip and applied the same profile manually, and get the same performance. Ryzen Master hasn't been anywhere near that BIOS chip.
Click to expand...

I think hes assuming people are on an older BIOS, which probably isn't the case.
 
So my spec is as per sig - been running it for a few weeks now. Literally all the tuning I did in the BIOS was enabling XMP so my ram is at 3600Mhz and the tighter timings.

I'm currently getting 7026 in Cinebench 20, but I notice that when running it, HWiNFO is showing most cores average at 4Ghz. I'm not after going mental on the overclock, just a decent uplift that doesn't put too much strain on the machine - its on 24x7

Reading here, it sounds like I need to use the 1usmus tool and do wizardry with PBO, PPT, TCD and EDC... Those last 3 when watching Ryzen Master during Cinebench go to 100%, 94% and 99% respectively (142W, 95A, 140A settings according to the tool)... is that why I'm not getting as high boosts as most of you?

Temperature wise it goes up to 65-68 degrees, and then drops straight back down to 35-38. I'm using the stock thermal pad on the cooler and I'm aware I need to improve my case cooling layout (LianLi Dynamic, 6 fans going in (bottom & side) and then the 360MM rad pushing out on the top currently...)

Can anyone help?
 
Conanius said:
So my spec is as per sig - been running it for a few weeks now. Literally all the tuning I did in the BIOS was enabling XMP so my ram is at 3600Mhz and the tighter timings.

I'm currently getting 7026 in Cinebench 20, but I notice that when running it, HWiNFO is showing most cores average at 4Ghz. I'm not after going mental on the overclock, just a decent uplift that doesn't put too much strain on the machine - its on 24x7

Reading here, it sounds like I need to use the 1usmus tool and do wizardry with PBO, PPT, TCD and EDC... Those last 3 when watching Ryzen Master during Cinebench go to 100%, 94% and 99% respectively (142W, 95A, 140A settings according to the tool)... is that why I'm not getting as high boosts as most of you?

Temperature wise it goes up to 65-68 degrees, and then drops straight back down to 35-38. I'm using the stock thermal pad on the cooler and I'm aware I need to improve my case cooling layout (LianLi Dynamic, 6 fans going in (bottom & side) and then the 360MM rad pushing out on the top currently...)

Can anyone help?
Click to expand...
Seems a little low, try a neg offset starting from - 0.025 down to - 0.075 in steps of 10 and see what that does to both multi and single core scores of CB20.

I wouldn't tweak anything else yet.

It should already be, but make sure your InfiFab is setting to ram speed. 1:1 so 3600 ram 1800 IF.

I max my ppt I think, but playing with those PBO figures did nothing but make it worse for me.
 
Panos said:
Unfortunately. If you want to play games with cores hitting 4600-4625 you either do the painful per core overclock on Ryzen Master, or reset everything, flash bios and put everything by hand.

Imho just wait until the AGESA 1005 is out for your motherboard. You will be flashing it either way :)
Click to expand...

I'm looking forward to 1005. Going to see if I can fix my poor R20 scores at last. I hadn't seen you had to remove Ryzen Master before resetting, does that help?
 
I get 7340 on a cold boot, 7280 once pc is up to twml. That's with a 0.1 under volt and pbo turned off. Will try to have another place at tweaking all the finer settings at some point, but for now I'm happy.
 
I've got a 3900x, Gigabyte Aorus Elite + Corsair Vengence Pro RGB 3600M2ZC18. I've got some results from using Thaipoon Burner and DRAM calculator. I want to double check my settings before I try for 3800MT/s again (@3733Mhz atm). I made a gallery on imgur with my settings and my queries https://imgur.com/a/2uxhgym.


For the main I've got pictures of my bios in the order they come up. I think my setting for VDDP is just pulled out of thin air as its +0.2v and DRAM calculator recommends 0.9v and the reported voltage is 1.116v.

Also on screenshot 01 & 01b I don't know where VDDIO is in the DRAM calculator but I think its DDR4 related, need to check bios for clues again.

Jayz2cents recommends setting Vcore to 1.3v, its currently maxing out @ 1.5v on F12f bios (latest). Set it to 1.352v hits 1.37v.

I'm getting 6298 in cinebench R20 without any CPU tweaks, unless you count giving more SoC voltage for IF stability.
 
Is that Cinebench score correct ?

6298 is way too low, 7100 would be around normal

EDIT - just looked through your pictures

Your FCLK is 1833 mhz , so your memory should be running at 3666 to be optimal 1:1
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom