Associate
- Joined
- 22 Apr 2013
- Posts
- 327
There is certainly some merit to staying within a range, typically 10-15% bf. Cut to 10%, bulk until reaching 15%, rinse and repeat. I won't go into the myriad reasons here, but in essence, yes, you're not entirely wrong. That's definitely one way of doing it.Are you saying it's not worth getting the body-fat down to a good level first before starting to bulk up for the first time?, if I'll be gaining fat as part of the bulking process it was under the impression that it's usually best to get-to a rough target BF% first, then start bulking.
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but I was under impression that was the standard.
The problem is that getting down to 10-12% bf is NOT DIFFICULT. It can be done fairly quickly and does not require 18 months worth of dieting, as you've been doing. You're probably around about that sort of bf already, if you go for a standard caliper test (e.g. Durnin Womersley). All you're doing now is spinning your wheels, making minimal further progress on fat loss and more or less no progress on muscle gain.
A competitive bodybuilder may take a year to get down from 30-35% bf to stage-shredded. Getting from regular bf levels (15-20%) to 10% can be done in a matter of a few months, maybe even 2 months or less in some instances. Not 18 months.
Last edited: