Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Scoobie Dave said:Never mind that I want to know why you aint got to 4GHz!
grs_link said:so is anyone with a 6400 or 6600 runniing at 8/9x333 for 24.7?
rock stable... i mean for more than 2 weeks with no crashes,,, not even game crashes to desktop... and offcourse 6400mems at 1:1
please let me know as my basket is a click away
matt1 said:What volts are you running through the FSB, MCH, ICH for those FSBs?
matt1 said:Ouch, more than I though. My system runs 400FSB fine at Auto settings, ran at 414 for a while but backed off to 400 due to wanting to use my system rather than stability testing. Looks like 428 (for 3GHz) is going to take some extra volts, managed to use clockgen up to 441 before a freeze so it's got to be possible (he hopes)
matt1 said:Couldn't agree more, this has 3.2+ in it but I simply can't take the FSB that high with this board - originally had a E6600 otherwise I would have got a DS3. In reality I can't get this chip higher than 3GHz for 24/7 usage without frying my board.
matt1 said:Felt I went OTT, originally thought I'd upgrade my Venice to an X2. Then thought Core Duo will cost me a bit more but I could do with going 2Gb of RAM, should have gone for a 6300/6400 originally but got swayed into a 6600 for the extra cache. Bottom line, I spent too much and could recoop £100 by downgrading and getting comparable performance. This 6300 is plenty fast enough
matt1 said:Beats me
Good luck getting a 6600 to 3.6G aswell, on sensible volts.
matt1 said:To be fair, only a few chips can do that, a lot of people were misled by the ES results. +0.2v for 24/7 usage is quite high, and I imagine it'd get quite hot too.
fornowagain said:Week 27 E6600 are doing well, I've seen quite a few 3.6GHz+ on air with less volts than mine, yet to see many week 28's. They seem to be getting better week by week, the early ones not so good. Don't know if its a solid trend or the 27's are a cherry week.
<maddness> said:lo your holding onto that faulty board too tight, just imagine you go for a refund and just get offered a replacement only .
Im bored with the p5b deluxe, i need something new but that stupid molex connector at the bottom on the abit & the weird all in one heatsink arrangement is pants, bah
Bito said:SM2, i get 2082 at 9 x 400 on old XP install.
I ran the 6400 at 3.5 Ghz, although i could get more at higher vcore out of it.
w3bbo said:New Bios looks good :
Need to WC the NB and overall temps should also come down a little hopefully, once my alphacool DDC plexi-top arrives
w3bbo said:1405...thats why i included CPU-Z mainboard shot
you still on 804 Devious?Devious said:everyone was saying the 1405 was worse for overlocking even though it added the multiplier in bios ??