Ukraine Invasion - Please do not post videos showing attacks/similar

Status
Not open for further replies.
Soldato
Joined
26 May 2009
Posts
22,101
Yeah.... "peacekeeping"
I'm sure it will be fine, Russia are good at peacekeeping, the peacekeeping forces they sent to the breakaway ethnic Russian regions in northern Georgia did a great job until they got shot in a totally not a false flag operation and Russia had to invade Georgia to avenge them xD


NB: OT but in all serious Russian peacekeepers are actually surprisingly good, the ones in Bosnia were much better than their gung-ho American counterparts.
 
Permabanned
Joined
13 Mar 2020
Posts
627
I'm sure it will be fine, Russia are good at peacekeeping, the peacekeeping forces they sent to the breakaway ethnic Russian regions in northern Georgia did a great job until they got shot in a totally not a false flag operation and Russia had to invade Georgia to avenge them xD


NB: OT but in all serious Russian peacekeepers are actually surprisingly good, the ones in Bosnia were much better than their gung-ho American counterparts.

An independent report commissioned by the European Union concluding that "open hostilities began with a large-scale Georgian military operation against Tskhinvali and the surrounding areas" on 7 August, and were a disproportionate response to ongoing separatist attacks on Georgian villages and law enforcement units

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsibility_for_the_Russo-Georgian_War#:~:text=An independent report commissioned by,villages and law enforcement units.

Russians went overboard but Saakashvili went too far as well. Perhaps it was agreed false flag.

No one has denied that Saakahsvili has literally bombed Tsikinvali where Russian peacekeepers were. Not smart.
 
Permabanned
Joined
13 Mar 2020
Posts
627
I can’t be bothered with you any more, it’s like talking to a brick wall

I'm not denying that this will put Russian troops officially on ground. And that next time there is Shelling in Donbass, we will see a full force of Kalibr or Iskander missiles hitting Ukranian positions.

I'm simply saying, we had a rhetoric going on since 2014 along with sanctions - that Russian Army were already in Donbass. So it is hard to get all amped up about it - considering we declared they were there since 2014/2015, we also put Sanctions on Russia for it as well.

Quite frankly I'm sure in coming days, we will see a huge response on either real or fake Ukranian shelling of Donbass. Something that will allow Putin to come out and say, see - we told you, we were never here prior to now.

Probably dropping quite a few of Kalibrs on Ukranian positions that 'allegedly fired' something that 'proves' all previous responses were in fact not Russian army but separatists since they lacked firepower.
 
Associate
Joined
31 Oct 2005
Posts
444
Very interested in a rough outline of such a membership, how can you simplify "attack on one is an attack on all members" into something that would both save Ukraine and prevent WW3?

Some NATO countries are already providing 'assistance' to Ukraine. Putin suggested earlier his desire to recreate the USSR, notwithstanding some are current NATO members. So at some stage, unless there is a coup in Russia or he is replaced, NATO maybe faced with that stark choice.
 
Caporegime
Joined
29 Dec 2007
Posts
31,991
Location
Adelaide, South Australia
It was in response to his discission about the current situation where talks are being held...but you feel you need to take it out of that context and start some other discussion

I wasn't aware that the context was so narrow. Perhaps you should have said 'Putin hasn't launched another invasion yet.'

Ok so then why does Biden even agreed to meet Putin if he has not yet invaded Ukraine? Because according to you - it has already been invaded. So

A) Biden is an idiot
B) It's a meeting that never can happen, we're just trolling
C) In current situation, we do not care about prior invasion of Crimea and Donbass and are talking about here and now.

Biden is meeting with Putin to prevent a fresh invasion that will likely increase the size of Russian-occupied Ukrainian territory. This is not rocket science, I don't know why you're finding it so difficult to understand.

Putin expected to address the Russian people imminently; expect him to recognise the disputed areas

And there it is: 'Russian President Vladimir Putin officially recognises independence of Ukrainian separatist regions.'
 
Soldato
Joined
21 Nov 2004
Posts
2,830
Still seems like Putin is holding all the cards.

Ukraine has basically been handed on a platter by the West, it's just a question of how bloody an invasion would be. After declaring the independent states I'm expecting the Russian troops to enter and then push the front line of the 'rebels' forward towards Kiev. The Russian's love deniability even when it's plain to see what is happening.

I still think Putin's long game is to get into Hungary and then to the Adriatic sea. Hungary refused NATO troops, Orban would probably be another Lukashenko and roll on his back. Putin also wanted a naval base in Montenegro a few years ago that he didn't get. If he ends up joining the dots then he has completely engulfed Western Europe and controls everything that goes in and out by land.

Plus there is the baiting of American heavy artillery into Russia, which I don't think USA would want to do. It may be that Russia has developed some novel technology and feel they have the upper hand, making them confident that now is the time to make their move. If say Russia's conventional missile technology can hold its own or better, then that would probably give China confidence to attack Taiwan. In a doomsday scenario it might even make MAD not quite so mutual...
 
Permabanned
Joined
13 Mar 2020
Posts
627
Biden is meeting with Putin to prevent a fresh invasion that will likely increase the size of Russian-occupied Ukrainian territory. This is not rocket science, I don't know why you're finding it so difficult to understand.

Did you see option C)

Ok so then why does Biden even agreed to meet Putin if he has not yet invaded Ukraine? Because according to you - it has already been invaded. So

A) Biden is an idiot
B) It's a meeting that never can happen, we're just trolling
C) In current situation, we do not care about prior invasion of Crimea and Donbass and are talking about here and now.
 
Soldato
Joined
21 Oct 2012
Posts
10,839
Location
London/S Korea
Still seems like Putin is holding all the cards.

Ukraine has basically been handed on a platter by the West, it's just a question of how bloody an invasion would be. After declaring the independent states I'm expecting the Russian troops to enter and then push the front line of the 'rebels' forward towards Kiev. The Russian's love deniability even when it's plain to see what is happening.

I still think Putin's long game is to get into Hungary and then to the Adriatic sea. Hungary refused NATO troops, Orban would probably be another Lukashenko and roll on his back. Putin also wanted a naval base in Montenegro a few years ago that he didn't get. If he ends up joining the dots then he has completely engulfed Western Europe and controls everything that goes in and out by land.

Plus there is the baiting of American heavy artillery into Russia, which I don't think USA would want to do. It may be that Russia has developed some novel technology and feel they have the upper hand, making them confident that now is the time to make their move. If say Russia's conventional missile technology can hold its own or better, then that would probably give China confidence to attack Taiwan. In a doomsday scenario it might even make MAD not quite so mutual...
Hungary, Montenegro etc. are NATO members so Russia would be removed off the face of the planet if they stepped foot there.
 
Permabanned
Joined
13 Mar 2020
Posts
627
Hungary, Montenegro etc. are NATO members so Russia would be removed off the face of the planet if they stepped foot there.

Russia would be removed off the face of the planet * with everyone else apart from cockroaches.

There fixed it for you.

So lets make sure he does not go there in first place, better yet, lets make sure Russian people kick him out and elect someone else.
 
Soldato
Joined
26 May 2009
Posts
22,101
I dont know what Yanukovich promised but he did win against a very Pro-EU candidate.
Yanukovich was a pro-EU candidate himself, he wouldn't have been elected otherwise, it's just he wasn't anti-Russia like the other guy.


Also, Yanukovich,Russia,EU and Protestors signed agreement he is to step down and hold new elections as result of Maidan.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agreement_on_settlement_of_political_crisis_in_Ukraine

What happend next? Ukrainian Far right stormed the parliament
Missed the part where Yanukovich had protest fired upon by his police injuring over a thousand and resulting in dozens of deaths, that was kinda a major factor in his fleeing the city a couple of days later and being impeached in absence :p


tried to ban Russian language.
Common internet myth based on Russian misinformation, what actually happened was that they voted to repeal a 2012 law that gave Russian, Hungarian, Moldovan and Romanian languages the legal right to be used in courts/schools/institutions in areas where the corresponding ethnic minorities exceeded >10% of the population, however the vote was vetoed a couple of days later by the acting president. Of course when Russian media started broadcasting the news to Donetsk/etc they went with the story you have heard.


Then continued to sign EU association before elections and therefore giving people a choice.
People had a choice, they elected a president who promised to sign it, they repeatedly polled in favour of it, and removed by force the president after he refused to sign it.
 
Permabanned
Joined
13 Mar 2020
Posts
627
Yanukovich was a pro-EU candidate himself, he wouldn't have been elected otherwise, it's just he wasn't anti-Russia like the other guy.



Missed the part where Yanukovich had protest fired upon by his police injuring over a thousand and resulting in dozens of deaths, that was kinda a major factor in his fleeing the city a couple of days later and being impeached in absence :p



Common internet myth based on Russian misinformation, what actually happened was that they voted to repeal a 2012 law that gave Russian, Hungarian, Moldovan and Romanian languages the legal right to be used in courts/schools/institutions in areas where the corresponding ethnic minorities exceeded >10% of the population, however the vote was vetoed a couple of days later by the acting president. Of course when Russian media started broadcasting the news to Donetsk/etc they went wiht the story you have heard.



People had a choice, they elected a president who promised to sign it, they repeatedly polled in favour of it, and removed by force the president after he refused to sign it.

The whole police shooting people stuff is ongoing investigation to this day. Because there is no clear evidence and some points to it being false flag from protestors side. Look at Zelenskiy promise during elections, his hint was to finally investigate and put people responsible in jail. The hint was that this was false flag by protestors.

The Russian language is not a myth, they tried to ban Russian language along with other languages from use on official levels. Its true. You even agree. Regardless, bad optics for sure especially in days it took for Yatseniuk or whoever to veto it.

Lastly, Russian does not even have minority language status in Ukraine today quite frankly. Because its not NATO or Western language. Just to show if this was a nothing burger or not.

I personally believe, if protestors stuck to EU/RUSSIA/Yanokuvich agreements, Crimea and Donbass would never have happend. Poroshenko was going to win those elections regardless. Again to at least make it somewhat friendly, why not just wait couple months till elections and then sign the agreement.

It's dubious to accept such great laws by government that is not elected and is appointed by force.

2017 law "On Education"[edit]
On September 25, 2017, a new law on education was signed by President (draft approved by Rada on September 5, 2017) which says that Ukrainian language is the language of education at all levels except for one or more subjects that are allowed to be taught in two or more languages, namely English or one of the other official languages of the European Union. The law stipulates a 3-year transitional period to come in full effect.[5][36] In February 2018 this period was extended until 2023.[37]

The law was condemned by PACE that called it "a major impediment to the teaching of national minorities".[38] The law also faced criticism from officials in Hungary, Romania and Russia.[39] (Hungarian and Romanian are official languages of the European Union, Russian is not.[40][41]) Ukrainian officials stressed that the new law complies fully with European norms on minority rights

So much of nothiburger that even PACE (European parliamentary assembly) is unhappy with it.

https://censor.net/ru/news/3153351/...edovanii_del_mayidana_i_ilovayiska_zelenskiyi


“How to put an end to this matter, I don’t have an answer now, because everything that I received from previous representatives of the Prosecutor General’s Office, and the documents that remained from them, there was no and there is no transparent answer,” the president stressed. He noted that he talked with the prosecutor who deals with Maidan cases, who told him about a large number of open proceedings and arrested persons.

"And who were the customers ... Tell this story, it's a terrible story, so many people died. I did not receive an answer to this, because I was told that it would last for years, and hundreds or thousands of specialists would need to be involved. I would I really wanted to put an end to this matter," Zelensky said during a press marathon. Source: https://censor.net/ru/n3153351
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom