Somewhat but not without my mistakes. My first year i was just like our mr cocacola, tried to tick every box. Made plenty of gains as a new lifter but could have done better. Next 2 years i learned and focused on compound lifts and less auxillaries. I probably did achieve (just) the targets i laid out in those 3 years. Apart from bodyfat which i still struggle with i managed bodyweight lifts or above in all but OHP (@ over 100kg bw). Without steroids and without any special training, just 4 major compounds, 3 auxillaries in an 8866 set pattern.
From there i went to the dark side for 6 months, gained very quickly, got big, not a million miles from where i am now, maybe a bit fatter. I got coeliac disease, undiagnosed, came off steroids with no PCT stopped eating entirely, stopped training.
When i got better i ended up somewhere behind my best natural levels, but with a good base and a new enforced dietary plan. I worked hard for a year to get back into shape and get my lifts up, before turning back to the dark side to continue where i left off.
Im stronger than ever now, far bigger and far leaner than at any point. Sure ive taken a different path to many, but ultimately i still hit the gym, start with a compound and then work some auxillary hypertrophy. Its a cornerstone that should be respected. And the next time someone extolls the virtues of a 10x10 5x5 or HST routine. Remember to look at what they have achieved. Because whilst there is loads of merit in a lot of these training styles, all the big guys i talk to have much the same opinion as me, doubly so when referring to people in the first 3-5 years of natural training.